XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: ukmanchU@uke.ork   
      
   Brock McNuggets  wrote in   
   news:6942f073$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
      
   > On Dec 17, 2025 at 10:32:57 AM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote   
   > :   
   >   
   >> Brock McNuggets  wrote in   
   >> news:6942b870$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
   >>   
   >>> On Dec 17, 2025 at 1:31:26 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote   
   >>> :   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 10/12/2025 14:44, Brock McNuggets wrote:   
   >>>>> On Dec 10, 2025 at 6:17:07 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote   
   >>>>> :   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:   
   >>>>>>> "Roy S."    
   >>>>>>> news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025   
   >>>>>>> 03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's   
   >>>>>>> all fake' routine.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Seems reasonable.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I think so.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> The link they gave:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> *IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if   
   >>>>>> a case does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post   
   >>>>>> is true — it only verifies whether such a case number exists.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Wait? It does? What is the case?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Your divorce.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide   
   >>>>>> without a VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It is odd that it would be location based.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I don't think that should be the case. Maybe it is a spoof site?   
   >>>   
   >>> At this point the whole topic is just to dox me.   
   >>   
   >> Actually is most likely to prove you are a fucking liar and a   
   >> dishonest piece of shit.   
   >   
   > If so the lies would be quotable. That is how it works in text. But   
   > you trolls will never stop. You start with saying that it is to prove   
   > I lied, but then fail to show it. Carroll lied and said she initiated   
   > the divorce when proof shows I am the one who first filed.   
   >   
   > You then say:   
   >     -----   
   >     The dates show you were the one, but a very short time frame, to   
   >     file   
   > first.   
   >     Big deal.   
   >     ----   
   > When Carroll lies, and you acknowledge he did, you do not care. But   
   > then you say I lied in a way you cannot show. Again, ALL of this has   
   > been beaten to death:   
   >   
   > * There is no evidence on the .gov site to back ANY of the   
   > accusations.   
   >   
   > * For ones where it is claimed there as a dismissal, it is POSSIBLE,   
   > though very unlikely, that they could be sealed or expunged. Multiple   
   > lawyer sites say they have never seen this, but it is at least legally   
   > possible.   
   >   
   > * The idea there was a plea bargain (which implies a guilty finding)   
   > but also no guilty finding is contradictory.   
   >   
   > * The idea there was a restraining order and it was broken and then   
   > removed is essentially impossible -- it would be breaking many laws   
   > and court rules.   
   >   
   > * The idea there was some monitoring program is also equally   
   > impossible.   
   >   
   > * The image shown is clearly false: it claims but Civil and   
   > Criminal... no single charge is both (at least in my jurisdiction).   
   >   
   > These are all facts. But they ignore the bigger one:   
   >   
   > * The fact the trolls are obsessing over my life and doxxing me is   
   > immoral and likely illegal.   
   >   
   > Those are the facts, no matter how many times you dox, lie, and   
   > attack. And you know it... if you REALLY thought I lied you would   
   > quote said lies. You do not even try. Not even you think I lied.   
   >   
      
   So now your story morphs once again.   
   Thank you for unequivocally proving my points.   
      
      
      
   --   
   Roy Scheinberg.   
   To learn all about the snit Michael Glasser Troll   
   simply use a free trial to newshosting.com and you   
   can download all messages back to 2004.   
   Some late 2000's messages are mixed in there as well.   
   Instant database.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)