XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com
On Dec 17, 2025 at 10:32:57 AM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote
:
> Brock McNuggets wrote in
> news:6942b870$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
>> On Dec 17, 2025 at 1:31:26 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
>> :
>>
>>> On 10/12/2025 14:44, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>> On Dec 10, 2025 at 6:17:07 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
>>>>>> "Roy S."
>>>>>> news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025
>>>>>> 03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all
>>>>>> fake' routine.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!
>>>>>
>>>>> Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-
>>>>>
>>>>> https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png
>>>>
>>>> Seems reasonable.
>>>
>>> I think so.
>>>
>>>>> The link they gave:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.
>>>>>
>>>>> But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a
>>>>> case does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.
>>>>>
>>>>> The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post is
>>>>> true — it only verifies whether such a case number exists.
>>>>
>>>> Wait? It does? What is the case?
>>>
>>> Your divorce.
>>>
>>>>> I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide
>>>>> without a VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.
>>>>
>>>> It is odd that it would be location based.
>>>
>>> I don't think that should be the case. Maybe it is a spoof site?
>>
>> At this point the whole topic is just to dox me.
>
> Actually is most likely to prove you are a fucking liar and a dishonest
> piece of shit.
If so the lies would be quotable. That is how it works in text. But you trolls
will never stop. You start with saying that it is to prove I lied, but then
fail to show it. Carroll lied and said she initiated the divorce when proof
shows I am the one who first filed.
You then say:
-----
The dates show you were the one, but a very short time frame, to file
first.
Big deal.
----
When Carroll lies, and you acknowledge he did, you do not care. But then you
say I lied in a way you cannot show. Again, ALL of this has been beaten to
death:
* There is no evidence on the .gov site to back ANY of the accusations.
* For ones where it is claimed there as a dismissal, it is POSSIBLE, though
very unlikely, that they could be sealed or expunged. Multiple lawyer
sites say they have never seen this, but it is at least legally possible.
* The idea there was a plea bargain (which implies a guilty finding) but
also no guilty finding is contradictory.
* The idea there was a restraining order and it was broken and then removed
is essentially impossible -- it would be breaking many laws and court rules.
* The idea there was some monitoring program is also equally impossible.
* The image shown is clearly false: it claims but Civil and Criminal... no
single charge is both (at least in my jurisdiction).
These are all facts. But they ignore the bigger one:
* The fact the trolls are obsessing over my life and doxxing me is immoral and
likely illegal.
Those are the facts, no matter how many times you dox, lie, and attack. And
you know it... if you REALLY thought I lied you would quote said lies. You do
not even try. Not even you think I lied.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with
you.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
