XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com   
      
   On Dec 17, 2025 at 12:04:02 PM MST, "%" wrote   
   :   
      
   > Brock McNuggets wrote:   
   >> On Dec 17, 2025 at 11:23:08 AM MST, "%" wrote   
   >> :   
   >>   
   >>> Brock McNuggets wrote:   
   >>>> On Dec 17, 2025 at 10:32:57 AM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote   
   >>>> :   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Brock McNuggets  wrote in   
   >>>>> news:6942b870$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Dec 17, 2025 at 1:31:26 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote   
   >>>>>> :   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 10/12/2025 14:44, Brock McNuggets wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Dec 10, 2025 at 6:17:07 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote   
   >>>>>>>> :   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> "Roy S."    
   >>>>>>>>>> news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025   
   >>>>>>>>>> 03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all   
   >>>>>>>>>> fake' routine.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Seems reasonable.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I think so.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> The link they gave:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> *IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a   
   >>>>>>>>> case does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post is   
   >>>>>>>>> true — it only verifies whether such a case number exists.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Wait? It does? What is the case?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Your divorce.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide   
   >>>>>>>>> without a VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> It is odd that it would be location based.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I don't think that should be the case. Maybe it is a spoof site?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> At this point the whole topic is just to dox me.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Actually is most likely to prove you are a fucking liar and a dishonest   
   >>>>> piece of shit.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If so the lies would be quotable. That is how it works in text. But you   
   trolls   
   >>>> will never stop. You start with saying that it is to prove I lied, but   
   then   
   >>>> fail to show it. Carroll lied and said she initiated the divorce when   
   proof   
   >>>> shows I am the one who first filed.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You then say:   
   >>>>       -----   
   >>>>       The dates show you were the one, but a very short time frame, to   
   file   
   >>>> first.   
   >>>>       Big deal.   
   >>>>       ----   
   >>>> When Carroll lies, and you acknowledge he did, you do not care. But then   
   you   
   >>>> say I lied in a way you cannot show. Again, ALL of this has been beaten to   
   >>>> death:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> * There is no evidence on the .gov site to back ANY of the accusations.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> * For ones where it is claimed there as a dismissal, it is POSSIBLE,   
   though   
   >>>> very unlikely, that they could be sealed or expunged. Multiple lawyer   
   >>>> sites say they have never seen this, but it is at least legally possible.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> * The idea there was a plea bargain (which implies a guilty finding) but   
   >>>> also no guilty finding is contradictory.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> * The idea there was a restraining order and it was broken and then   
   removed   
   >>>> is essentially impossible -- it would be breaking many laws and court   
   rules.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> * The idea there was some monitoring program is also equally impossible.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> * The image shown is clearly false: it claims but Civil and Criminal... no   
   >>>> single charge is both (at least in my jurisdiction).   
   >>>>   
   >>>> These are all facts. But they ignore the bigger one:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> * The fact the trolls are obsessing over my life and doxxing me is   
   immoral and   
   >>>> likely illegal.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Those are the facts, no matter how many times you dox, lie, and attack.   
   And   
   >>>> you know it... if you REALLY thought I lied you would quote said lies.   
   You do   
   >>>> not even try. Not even you think I lied.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>> he always lies he lied to me about me   
   >>   
   >> With multiple names.   
   >>   
   > no he used just one name but he offered me ,   
   > a deal to get out of the lie   
      
   Not surprising.   
      
   --   
   It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with   
   you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)