Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.mac.advocacy    |    Steve Jobs fetishistic worship forum    |    120,746 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 119,324 of 120,746    |
|    CrudeSausage to -hh    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IMKjMjIwIOKAmGZvciBhIGN1dC    |
|    19 Dec 25 08:49:27    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy       From: crude@sausa.ge              On 2025-12-18 9:58 p.m., -hh wrote:       > On 12/17/25 21:50, CrudeSausage wrote:       >> On 2025-12-17 8:26 p.m., -hh wrote:       >>> [...]       >>>       >>> Not to say that Apple is perfect, but in trying to think of the last       >>> time that I had to have a Mac be serviced ... I'd probably have to go       >>> back to a 2005 vintage PowerMac G5's CD/DVD burner.       >>       >> For what it's worth, I loved the PowerBook G4 I had in the early 2000s       >> and the iMac G5 that replaced it.       >       > I got a 12" PB G4 at one point ... actually still have it: I'll have to       > see if it still boots up, and what's still on it. Think all of the       > Intel MBP laptops got traded-in, but I still have two cheesegraters.              There was something special about the Macs that didn't run on Intel       chips, even back then. Of course, their performance was rather awful at       some point and Apple didn't have a choice but to go to Intel, but the       magic was lost the moment they did so. Luckily, they are back to using       their own chips and have restored that magic.              < snip >              >> I can't imagine going back to an Android now that I'm with the iPhone       >> 13. I can get used to it again either way, but I never really found       >> Android to be a pleasant experience.       >       > I do wonder sometimes of how many people are Android users simply       > because they are "Apple haters" for whatever reason.              I know that a few are aware of the company (and their government's)       desire to censor everything, so Android's ability to sideload       application is a benefit. Of course, a few manufacturers seem to be       actively disabling that feature, so the benefit won't be around for much       longer. Once it's gone, there will truly be no good reason to choose       Android over iOS.              >>> I think it was Civ 3 and/or 5 that I had squandered many an hour on;       >>> was a good diversion at the time.       >>       >> It's the most perfect game I have ever come across.       >       > The last version I had ran on Steam...hmm...going to have to see if I       > can go find my Steam account to try running it again.       >       > (update: found some ancient Civ 2(!) files ... and the Steam account       > for V ... might be out of touch until mid-January now)              I had the original Civilization on a computer I traded for. I had never       heard of the game but the original owner was nice enough to show me how       it worked and I didn't immediately realize how much that game was going       to take over my life. Once the 2 came out, I was dazzled by the       full-motion video. It gave the game some additional personality that       made it even more fun to play. Of course, the personality of the       original, with Genghis Khan and others smiling as they're offering you       garbage deals was fun too.              < snip >              >> My wife flat-out refuses to get an electric car and considering the       >> problems they've been shown to have (as well as the fact that they       >> don't truly benefit "the planet" like they claim), I'm quite happy to       >> hold onto my gas engine. Besides, electric cars wear out tires faster       >> even if you accept the risks attached to those vehicles or truly       >> believe that you're saving the world by owning one.       >       > I suspect that a strategic mistake several automakers have made has been       > to try to jump to pure EV instead of the transitional step of a hybrid.       > The reason why is because from a manufacturer's perspective, a hybrid is       > the worst of both worlds: it has the costs of design & manufacture of       > two engines per vehicle instead of just one. Nevertheless, Toyota has       > announced that they're heading there more broadly. Time will tell to       > what degree its been in the back room at a lot of other OEMs which could       > be more broadly deployed; I know that Porsche has had a few models ship       > with hybrid configurations (eg. Panamera) which didn't get much attention.              If I were to get an EV of any kind, it would have to be hybrid. If the       electric motor fails, I want to know that the traditional engine will       still get me to my destination and vice versa. All I would want is       greater fuel economy. Saving the world is not my concern, especially       since my government and others are busily importing garbage people with       no concern for their immediate environment or social cohesion.              --       CrudeSausage       John 14:6       Windows is fine.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca