XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2025-12-24 17:26, Joel W. Crump wrote:   
   > On 12/24/25 8:16 PM, Alan wrote:   
   >   
   >>>>> Samsung's phones and Linux like I use, objectively, are for cool   
   >>>>> people, who choose the best.  Windows 11 is OK, for those who are   
   >>>>> less technically inclined.  macOS, though, is objectively inferior.   
   >>>   
   >>>> And yet you've never been able to express how.   
   >>>   
   >>> Apple is low-key.   
   >>   
   >> In what way?   
   >   
   >   
   > Don't feel bad,   
      
   I don't feel bad.   
      
   Why would i?   
      
   > though, it worked out well for MS Office and Adobe   
   > Photoshop, and so forth, they thrive on the Mac.  Winblows has its nice   
   > points but isn't really better *in every respect*, which is why macOS   
   > and Linux maintain such loyal followings.  I would never buy another   
   > Mac, but I understand the kinds of uses that would lead one to do it.   
   > Their presence in the market does matter, because it serves a   
   > substantial need among the public of consumers.   
   Failure to answer the question noted.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)