XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: crude@sausa.ge   
      
   On 2025-12-24 8:33 p.m., Alan wrote:   
   > On 2025-12-24 17:26, Joel W. Crump wrote:   
   >> On 12/24/25 8:16 PM, Alan wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>>>> Samsung's phones and Linux like I use, objectively, are for cool   
   >>>>>> people, who choose the best.  Windows 11 is OK, for those who are   
   >>>>>> less technically inclined.  macOS, though, is objectively inferior.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> And yet you've never been able to express how.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Apple is low-key.   
   >>>   
   >>> In what way?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Don't feel bad,   
   >   
   > I don't feel bad.   
   >   
   > Why would i?   
   >   
   >> though, it worked out well for MS Office and Adobe Photoshop, and so   
   >> forth, they thrive on the Mac.  Winblows has its nice points but isn't   
   >> really better *in every respect*, which is why macOS and Linux   
   >> maintain such loyal followings.  I would never buy another Mac, but I   
   >> understand the kinds of uses that would lead one to do it. Their   
   >> presence in the market does matter, because it serves a substantial   
   >> need among the public of consumers.   
   > Failure to answer the question noted.   
      
   He wouldn't buy another Mac because he doesn't have money to begin with.   
   The hardware he currently uses was purchased with money he received   
   during COVID and he only uses Linux because he's broke. He thought   
   people would pay for sex with him, but he disregarded the fact that the   
   market for sex with ugly people isn't very large.   
      
   --   
   CrudeSausage   
   John 14:6   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)