XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: nobody@haph.org
"David B." news:mqm3hjFtvrtU1@mid.individual.net Fri,
19 Dec 2025 22:56:50 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> On 19/12/2025 21:43, Kelly Phillips wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 20:35:37 +0000, "David B."
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/12/2025 03:10, Gremlin wrote:
>>>> He's writing about the snit discount. It's a real thing. A competitor
>>>> local to his former area created it. They give those who had their
>>>> computers worked on by snit and fucked up as a result a discount on
>>>> the service bill. I'm not the only one who called the store and
>>>> checked out the story.
>>>
>>> If true, provide the name and number and I will call them myself to
>>> verify your claim.
>>
>> You won't call.
>>
>> You've made that request before, and in response, someone posted the
>> name of the shop and their phone number *for you*. Not in some
>> unrelated thread, but in direct response to you, in your thread. Ring
>> any bells in that dense fog of yours?
>
> Cite the MessageID
It's long beyond time for you to remember various things. Even the things
which show what a dishonest incompetent piece of shit Snit is.
>> Do you remember what you did next? You went radio silent on the topic.
>
> Prove it. Cite the MessageID
It's already been proven. Several of us observed what you did in that
thread, David.
It's awful for you - but - great for me when another poster responds and
states what I already did concerning this subject. Your efforts to weasel
and lie here aren't working out so well these days.
You only have yourself to blame for that. You've tried it one too many
times.
>> Why not use your sweet detective skills to find the info? SC showed you
>> how to do that.
>
> Do your own dirty work.
Is this your way of admitting that you'll write as dishonestly as you feel
you need to continue trying to defend snit as well as yourself? It won't
help you, David.
Just about all of the regulars, if not all of them, know about the post
sharing the specific details and your complete loss of interest in the
subject as soon as you were provided everything needed to confirm that
such a discount did exist and the reason for it.
Face facts, bud. Snit tried to pass himself off as a technician and fucked
enough peoples computers up that another company played smart advertising
and took advantage of the situation. They also reversed the damage snit
caused.
You've already seen Snit require my assistance to arrive at the proper
diagnosis for his machine. You've seen me (along with others h0h0h0) teach
snit several things about his own machine. You observed me walk the dog on
him without having access to an Apple based product at any point as I did
so. I demonstrated having more knowledge of gear he runs on a daily basis
that I don't own.
You have seen me show snits incompetence, repeatedly. And, icing on the
cake for me, theres' no way for you to run intereferece of any kind to
save him. He's an end user like you who bit off more than he could chew.
You also observed snit (along with the majority of the rest of us if not
all of us) whine and cry as soon as the stores information was shared. He
actually claimed that calling the store to ask about that discount was the
same thing as harassing that store. He didn't want you to call them and
you did as he requested.
That doesn't change the fact that the discount thing is real or that you
have already been provided the necessary information the place the call.
Bud.
--
Liar, lawyer; mirror show me, what's the difference?
Kangaroo done hung the guilty with the innocent
Liar, lawyer; mirror for ya', what's the difference?
Kangaroo be stoned. He's guilty as the government
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
