XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
From: mariasophia@comprehension.com
Chris wrote:
> Maria Sophia wrote:
>> Every January 1st, I change the moniker on all my accounts for privacy.
>
> Donald, why do you have to lie incessantly? Especially when it's so easily
> refuted. This you posing as your "Andrew" moniker on 3rd Jan 2025
> https://rocksolid-eu.pugleaf.net/groups/misc.phone.mobile.ipho
e/articles/197566
>
> Plus, if only changed your nym once a year it would be great. You don't,
> however, and regularly subtly change your email address to evade killfiles.
> Or maybe it's more evidence of your incompetence that your scripts don't
> work as reliably as you think. Just like the unicode to ASCII converter.
> lol.
>
> Your privacy argument is also proven to be ridiculous as you can't even
> achieve the basics with your router. Remember you told us Apple couldn't
> reproduce your "discovery". A clear example of PEBKAC.
>
>> Maria Sophia is what the moniker is now.
>
> This is just a desperate attempt to get a response and probably an
> embarrassed reaction to you posting over 3x as much as the next person
> according to badgolferman's stats.
>
> This being over the christmas holidays. You really don't have a life, do
> you?
>
>> The rest of the headers are completely random from dictionary lookups
>> (as my "newsreader" is actually a bunch of scripts using telnet & gVim).
>
> Which often render incorrectly because you create invalid headers. Plus,
> you cannot keep track who you're responding to and regularly get it wrong.
>
>> I'm not "hiding from you". I change nothing but the headers. Hence, if you
>> can't figure out who I am in less than about ten seconds based on what I
>> write
>
> Yawn.
>
>> how I write it and how I post excellent research
>
> [narrator: this is a lie]
>
>> often backed up
>> by detailed annotated screenshots & photos,
>
> [narrator: this is a lie]
>
>> please don't exclaim a thousand
>> posts from now
>
> Ordinarily that would be a long time, but at your rate of posting, it's
> only about a week. lol.
>
>> that you finally eventually figured it out - as when you do
>> that - it's absurd you think I'm "hiding" from you.
>
> It's very obviously the opposite. You are intentionally doing this to draw
> attention to yourself.
>
> There are many famously anonymous people who never need to change their
> online/offline personas.
>
>> Just put me in your killfile because anyone saying that is someone who has
>> nothing to offer because if it's that difficult for anyone to figure out
>> what is never hidden, then you have no right to exclaim you're a genius.
>
> What this does achieve is make it almost impossible to search for your
> previous threads. Perfect for someone who doesn't want to be reminded of
> their previous unsupported claims and lies.
My response moments ago to Frank pretty much covers how I feel about it.
Frank Slootweg wrote:
> Happy New Year to you.
Happy New Year to you too.
For decades, I have responded to others exactly as they respond to me.
If you're respectful of me, I'm always likewise fully respectful of you.
That promise extends to everyone. It always has been that way.
The newsgroup benefits from all of our technical contributions.
For example, we answer questions, we test apps, we test out Google's and
Apple's WPS systems, we suggest modifications, we write tutorials, etc.
We all add value to the technical knowledge level of this newsgroup.
All that greatly added value is not found in the header, but in the body.
Like a gift is wrapped, where the value isn't in the pretty wrapping paper.
While the privacy goal is to munge the meaningless headers, if anyone can't
figure out my posts in ten seconds, they have no business being on this ng.
The privacy goal is to be harder to find by robots, not by actual people.
--
My goal on these Usenet newsgroups is to teach, learn and to help others.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
