Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.mac.advocacy    |    Steve Jobs fetishistic worship forum    |    120,746 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 119,715 of 120,746    |
|    Alan to Joel W. Crump    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Remember_when_setting_up    |
|    03 Jan 26 15:48:44    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2026-01-03 15:40, Joel W. Crump wrote:       > On 1/3/26 6:01 PM, Alan wrote:       >> On 2026-01-03 14:54, Joel W. Crump wrote:       >>> On 1/3/26 5:33 PM, Alan wrote:       >>>> On 2026-01-03 14:07, Joel W. Crump wrote:       >>>>> On 1/3/26 4:57 PM, Alan wrote:       >>>>>> On 2026-01-03 13:50, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       >>>>>>> On Sat, 03 Jan 2026 20:35:17 +0000, Tyrone wrote:       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> Arm CPUs are the best thing to happen to PCs since the SSD.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Second-best. RISC-V may yet surpass them. Maybe even LoongArch.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Ummmm... "may yet surpass" literally means "aren't YET as good".       >>>>>>       >>>>>>> And as usual, Linux is leading the way.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> LOL!       >>>>>       >>>>> Linux and Windows both support ARM, your precious Apple overlords       >>>>> aren't       >>>>       >>>> So? How does that show Linux "leading the way"?       >>>>       >>>> There's more to leading the way that simply being able to run an OS.       >>>>       >>>> People don't use the OS: they use applications that can run on that OS.       >>>>       >>>> And Apple has lead the way in making it possible to run a program       >>>> written for a different architecture on new one.       >>>>       >>>> Motorola to PowerPC       >>>>       >>>> PowerPC to Intel       >>>>       >>>> And now, Intel to Apple Silicon.       >>>       >>> As if that isn't par for the course? It's certainly not unique to       >>> Apple's platform, though they have done a good job in that aspect       >>> admittedly.       >>       >> Is it... ..."par for the course"?       >>       >> Show some other similar transitions.       >       >       > Does WinARM not run x86 software?              Did that happen before or AFTER Apple had worked out how to do it...              ...twice before?              >       >       >>>>> so special and genius in adopting it, though it has in many ways       >>>>> improved their own business, but to imagine that macOS's transition       >>>>> makes it unique here is typical Alan masturbatory logic and       >>>>> probable financial support by Apple in secret, because they need a       >>>>> Usenet shill       >>>>       >>>> Oh, this your new bullshit, is it?       >>>       >>> I don't really believe it, if that's the question, but to the casual       >>> observer it wouldn't be that hard to imagine, your debate tactics       >>> indicate a devotion to Apple that is so extreme that you have to       >>> avoid acknowledging other platforms' strong points *and* avoid       >>> addressing points about it by other posters, even accusing them of       >>> making things up and demanding unwarranted evidence.       >>       >> LOL!       >       >       > Laugh if you must but it's right there for anyone who's been reading       > this shit to see.       >       >       >>>>> they can depend on to obfuscate their drawbacks and exaggerate       >>>>> their better features, making it seem like the investment in a Mac       >>>>> isn't overpaying Apple but in fact an upgrade over its competition,       >>>>> a proposition easily refuted by actually using the three platforms       >>>>> enough to see how mediocre Apple's crapware really is.       >>>       >>>> And yet you can never actually articulate something that either       >>>> Linux or Windows does better.       >>>       >>> That's not really the issue, though, all three platforms do the same       >>> things from some perspective, my concern with macOS is that it's       >>> supposed to really stand out and yet that seems more true on having       >>> higher prices than actual use advantages.       >       >> So having declared it "crapware", you immediately admit you were       >> speaking bullshit.       >>       >> That's par for your course.       >       >       > It's not in every way crapware. But relative to the choices we have, it       > qualifies as such.              In ways you will never actually articulate.              We know.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca