home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.sys.mac.advocacy      Steve Jobs fetishistic worship forum      120,746 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 119,729 of 120,746   
   Gremlin to All   
   Re: Michael Glasser The Incest Supporter   
   04 Jan 26 03:51:53   
   
   XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: nobody@haph.org   
      
   Glock  news:69460c76$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com   
   Sat, 20 Dec 2025 02:39:50 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:   
      
   > On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 21:08:33 -0500, cc wrote:   
   >   
   >> I used to support snit under the nym of Onion Knight. I even made a   
   >> faked online recording with him in order to support what I assumed was a   
   >> decent human being. Later I learned what a sick individual this snit is.   
   >> I am truly sorry for acting as a stooge for this nut Michale Glasser.   
   >> I thought it might be fun but it has turned into a nightmare of regret   
   >> and second thoughts for me.   
   >   
   > I've seen the onion knight nym but I assumed it was just another snit sock   
   > puppet.   
   > Was that actually you?   
   >   
   >   
   >> You can read about it here and if you wish to listen to the recordings   
   >> you can search for them on this website.   
   >> https://techrights.org/wiki/Schestowitz/   
   >   
   > Never heard of this Schestowitz person before but looking at his blog   
   > he seems to be some kind of open source radical extremist.   
   > That's alright but sometimes these hard line crusaders do more harm than   
   > good.   
   > I need to look deeper into this Roy person.   
   > It's not high on my list of things to do though.   
      
      
   >> Snit's support of incest complete with links.   
   >   
   > The more I read about this snit cracked pot the more sick to my stomach I   
   > become.   
   >   
   > Divorce is rarely a good thing but in this case I suppose it was a prudent   
   > decision for his wife to get snit away from the kids.   
   > Who knows what was going on in that family. At least she, and the kids are   
   > done with snit and that should be a positive.   
   >   
   > The stuff posted below, assuming it really is snit and not some sporger is   
   > quite troubling.   
      
   You should read the comments he wrote that can be found in these articles:   
      
   [https://techrights.org/search/query?search=Search&query1=snit&set1=any]   
      
   You'll notice that Snits method of commenting is identical to the shit he   
   has been pulling here and elsewhere on usenet. Snit is one seriously messed   
   up mental puppy!   
      
   >> "I did say I do not see a victim to it and that, given that, I can see   
   >> arguments as to why it should not be illegal (it is a "victimless"   
   >> crime)."   
      
      
   Sick isn't he?   
      
      
   --   
   Liar, lawyer; mirror show me, what's the difference?   
   Kangaroo done hung the guilty with the innocent   
   Liar, lawyer; mirror for ya', what's the difference?   
   Kangaroo be stoned. He's guilty as the government   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca