Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.mac.advocacy    |    Steve Jobs fetishistic worship forum    |    120,746 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 119,753 of 120,746    |
|    Alan to CrudeSausage    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Remember_when_setting_up    |
|    04 Jan 26 11:23:37    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2026-01-03 18:20, CrudeSausage wrote:       > On 2026-01-03 17:39, Alan wrote:       >> On 2026-01-03 14:29, CrudeSausage wrote:       >>> On 2026-01-03 16:57, Alan wrote:       >>>> On 2026-01-03 13:50, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       >>>>> On Sat, 03 Jan 2026 20:35:17 +0000, Tyrone wrote:       >>>>>       >>>>>> Arm CPUs are the best thing to happen to PCs since the       >>>>>> SSD.       >>>>>       >>>>> Second-best. RISC-V may yet surpass them. Maybe even       >>>>> LoongArch.       >>>>       >>>> Ummmm... "may yet surpass" literally means "aren't YET as       >>>> good".       >>>       >>> Yes, everyone understood what he meant.       >>       >> He declared ARM CPUs "second-best", then literally contradicted       >> himself.       >       > What's best in 2026 might not remain best in 2027.              That's certainly true. How is it at all relevant?              > Intel and AMD       > controlled the processing world until Apple released their own       > silicon and made them look like amateurs. Then, Qualcomm released       > its own competitor to what Apple was selling and proved that       > challengers can come from the most unlikely of places.              Have they, though?              > Nothing is       > stopping the people who have more experience in designing chips from       > releasing something that makes the Mx series look pathetic in       > comparison. Admittedly though, I'd rather an Mx chip at this moment.              None of that changes Lawrence's statements which were in direct       contradiction with each other.              >       >>>       >>>>>       >>>>> And as usual, Linux is leading the way.       >>>>       >>>> LOL!       >>>       >>> Linux supports almost every platform under the sun. How many       >>> platforms does MacOS run on?       >> Do you buy a computer to run an OS?       >       > No, I buy hardware in the hope that I can do whatever I want with it       > for as long as I want. That's the x86-64 side for now, despite its       > obvious drawbacks.       I always think in terms of software.              Hardware is just a vehicle on which the software I want to use can run.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca