home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.sys.mac.advocacy      Steve Jobs fetishistic worship forum      120,746 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 119,759 of 120,746   
   Nobody to Brock McNuggets   
   Re: Would "proof" be a good killword?   
   04 Jan 26 20:13:08   
   
   XPost: alt.computer.workshop   
   From: yourusernamehere@talk.net   
      
   Brock McNuggets  wrote in   
   news:695ab6c5$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
      
   > On Jan 4, 2026 at 9:16:03 AM MST, "Nobody" wrote   
   > :   
   >   
   >> Brock McNuggets  wrote in   
   >> news:695a8e2e$4$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
   >>   
   >>> On Jan 4, 2026 at 8:29:10 AM MST, "Nobody" wrote   
   >>> :   
   >>>   
   >>>> Brock McNuggets  wrote in   
   >>>> news:695a84b8$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Jan 4, 2026 at 1:33:35 AM MST, ""J. P. Gilliver"" wrote   
   >>>>> <10jd8kv$1a0cd$2@dont-email.me>:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026/1/4 3:24:17, Brock McNuggets wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Jan 3, 2026 at 5:49:01 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote   
   >>>>>>> :   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> https://chatgpt.com/share/6959dd36-2e44-800c-a06e-46bb669f4a75   
   >>>>>>>     -----   
   >>>>>>>     Gremlin responds to a killfile discussion by asserting,   
   >>>>>> [8 more lines snipped]   
   >>>>>>>     -----   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I'm not interested in your opinion of other posters, if negative.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I was about to give a simple "these posts are not written for you"   
   >>>>> reply which would be accurate -- but here is more context.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> * In part I do reply out of exhaustion of the lies told about my   
   >>>>> online life, my business life, my legal history, and my personal   
   >>>>> life. They are pretty much non-stop.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> I think that is fair.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Narcissist much?   
   >>>   
   >>> No thank you. I have no interest in that. A shame, though, that you   
   >>> did not understand my comments. Care to read them again and try --   
   >>> even if you offer no response?   
   >   
   > You ignored the content to post a false insinuation. Seriously, given   
   > your clear interest why not try to understand what you are responding   
   > to? Do you want some help?   
      
   Projection again snit?   
   Hint: I'm not the person who has well known reading comprehension and   
   projection issues. That would be you.   
   I also do not support and defend incest like you do.   
   You should be locked away in a psych ward so you can be treated, snit.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca