XPost: alt.computer.workshop   
   From: yourusernamehere@talk.net   
      
   Brock McNuggets  wrote in news:695ace89$1$18   
   $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
      
   > On Jan 4, 2026 at 1:13:08 PM MST, "Nobody" wrote   
   > :   
   >   
   >> Brock McNuggets  wrote in   
   >> news:695ab6c5$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
   >>   
   >>> On Jan 4, 2026 at 9:16:03 AM MST, "Nobody" wrote   
   >>> :   
   >>>   
   >>>> Brock McNuggets  wrote in   
   >>>> news:695a8e2e$4$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Jan 4, 2026 at 8:29:10 AM MST, "Nobody" wrote   
   >>>>> :   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Brock McNuggets  wrote in   
   >>>>>> news:695a84b8$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Jan 4, 2026 at 1:33:35 AM MST, ""J. P. Gilliver"" wrote   
   >>>>>>> <10jd8kv$1a0cd$2@dont-email.me>:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026/1/4 3:24:17, Brock McNuggets wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Jan 3, 2026 at 5:49:01 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote   
   >>>>>>>>> :   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> https://chatgpt.com/share/6959dd36-2e44-800c-a06e-46bb669f4a75   
   >>>>>>>>>     -----   
   >>>>>>>>>     Gremlin responds to a killfile discussion by asserting,   
   >>>>>>>> [8 more lines snipped]   
   >>>>>>>>>     -----   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I'm not interested in your opinion of other posters, if   
   negative.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I was about to give a simple "these posts are not written for   
   you"   
   >>>>>>> reply which would be accurate -- but here is more context.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> * In part I do reply out of exhaustion of the lies told about my   
   >>>>>>> online life, my business life, my legal history, and my personal   
   >>>>>>> life. They are pretty much non-stop.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I think that is fair.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Narcissist much?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No thank you. I have no interest in that. A shame, though, that you   
   >>>>> did not understand my comments. Care to read them again and try --   
   >>>>> even if you offer no response?   
   >>>   
   >>> You ignored the content to post a false insinuation. Seriously, given   
   >>> your clear interest why not try to understand what you are responding   
   >>> to? Do you want some help?   
   >   
   > You did not answer the question.   
   >   
      
      
   Actually I did answer the question however your deceptive snipping   
   removed my reply.   
   Here it is again snit.   
   "   
      
   "Projection again snit?   
   Hint: I'm not the person who has well known reading comprehension and   
   projection issues. That would be you.   
   I also do not support and defend incest like you do.   
   You should be locked away in a psych ward so you can be treated, snit.   
   "   
      
   Get help Michael.   
   Quickly.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)