home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.sys.mac.advocacy      Steve Jobs fetishistic worship forum      120,937 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 120,232 of 120,937   
   vallor to CrudeSausage   
   Re: The trouble with Mac apps vs. Linux    
   22 Jan 26 03:41:51   
   
   XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: vallor@vallor.earth   
      
   At 21 Jan 2026 17:10:59 GMT, CrudeSausage  wrote:   
      
   > On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 20:28:27 +0000, vallor wrote:   
   >   
   > > At Tue, 20 Jan 2026 12:19:28 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2026-01-20 12:14, vallor wrote:   
   > >> > At Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:23:37 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >> >   
   > >> >> On 2026-01-20 09:47, CrudeSausage wrote:   
   > >> >>> On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 16:39:27 +0000, vallor wrote:   
   > >> >>>   
   > >> >>>> So say you side-load a Mac app.	You usually get a .dmg which you   
   > >> >>>> mount, then drag the app folder on top of the handy alias for the   
   > >> >>>> system app folders.   
   > >> >>>>   
   > >> >>>> That's fine, but what if you want to uninstall?	There doesn't seem   
   > >> >>>> to be much of a package manager involved.   
   > >> >>>>   
   > >> >>>> But on Linux, apps are in packages that are tracked by the system.   
   > >> >>>> When you uninstall an app on Linux, the default is to take away   
   > >> >>>> the app without touching config files -- but with the apt/dpkg   
   > >> >>>> "purge" option, the package system will clean out the config   
   > >> >>>> files, too.   
   > >> >>>>   
   > >> >>>> (Not user dot-files though, those are yours to keep.)   
   > >> >>>   
   > >> >>> Generally, even after I purge an application in Linux, its settings   
   > >> >>> remain. You have to manually delete the folder in .config the same   
   > >> >>> way you would in any other operating system. Of course, it's a lot   
   > >> >>> easier to do on Linux since those folders are exactly where you   
   > >> >>> would expect them to be, not lost in the registry or some obscure   
   > >> >>> folder.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> LOL!   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> Riiiiiiiight.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> What is "obscure" about the folders used in macOS?   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> Like so many do, you confuse what you are not USED TO with something   
   > >> >> being wrong.   
   > >> >   
   > >> > You forget that I have a Mac Studio, and it is running Tahoe. BTW,   
   > >> > the 64GB and Apple M2 Ultra processor, coupled with the extra   
   > >> > storage, as well as the Studio monitor, ended up north of $7K to   
   > >> > purchase in the Apple store.  (I justified the expense by thinking of   
   > >> > it as a Unix workstation -- which it ultimately is.)   
   > >> >   
   > >> > Anyhow:  On Linux, apt/dpkg (and dnf/rpm) keep track of what has been   
   > >> > installed -- each and every file.   
   > >>   
   > >> And apps on the Mac keep all of their functional parts within the app   
   > >> package.   
   > >   
   > > But not their config files, according to   
   > >   
   > > <696fe2ea$1$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>   
   >   
   > This is what I meant by "obscure folder."   
   >   
   > < snip >   
      
   Didn't seem that obscure to me:   
      
   For the user:   
      
   Linux: ~/.config/   
   MacOS: ~/Library/   
      
   --   
   -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 Mem: 258G   
      OS: Linux 6.18.5 D: Mint 22.3 DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)   
      NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090Ti (24G) (580.105.08)   
      "The days of the digital watch are numbered"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca