Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.mac.advocacy    |    Steve Jobs fetishistic worship forum    |    120,746 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 120,392 of 120,746    |
|    Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOlivei to Brock McNuggets    |
|    Re: The trouble with Mac apps vs. Linux     |
|    31 Jan 26 01:44:41    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy       From: ldo@nz.invalid              On 30 Jan 2026 15:29:48 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:              > On Jan 29, 2026 at 10:23:42 PM MST, "Lawrence D´Oliveiro" wrote       > <10lhf8u$1s04g$1@dont-email.me>:       >       >> On 30 Jan 2026 03:53:29 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:       >>       >>> You have also made it clear you do not mean to suggest Apple       >>> products, in general, are less reliable or have a shorter       >>> lifespan.       >>>       >>> So you are pointing to one very specific thing with a strong focus       >>> but no actual broad point.       >>       >> In case it isn’t already clear, from what Gremlin has been trying       >> explain (repeatedly), the odds of a particular component failure in       >> Apple gear may not be that different from that of a similar thing       >> happening in non-Apple gear, but the consequences of such a failure       >> will likely be more drastic.       >       > Big picture: Are Macs less reliable?              As the first ARM-based Macs gradually take over more and more of the       used-Mac market, the answer to this will likely become more clear.              Let’s just say, I wouldn’t want to bet against the iFixit guys ...              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca