Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.mac.advocacy    |    Steve Jobs fetishistic worship forum    |    120,746 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 120,559 of 120,746    |
|    Tom Elam to All    |
|    OT: Just for HH    |
|    09 Feb 26 21:45:00    |
      From: thomas.e.elam@gmail.com              Yes, that raw temp/kWh/day scatter plot showed a lot of randomness. But       as I tried to explain there were other variables that accounted for       apparent random scatter not explained by temperature. I just got around       to creating a scatter plot to show how that looks:              https://drive.google.com/file/d/1x5bPywVfOGnUdMoPhgFGM7rVXKNhBx9       /view?usp=sharing              As you layer in the home change variables in over time the pattern       emerges as a set lower and lower predicted kWh/day layers in the       predicted values. Thus the 97% R^2 for the final equation.              Notes: The windows were installed across 2 years. First the south side       and then north side of the house. The intercept shifter was 0.5 for the       first set and 1.0 for the second. Worked well.              There is no layer for days away from home. That remains as a random       shifter of predicted use.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca