Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.mac.advocacy    |    Steve Jobs fetishistic worship forum    |    120,937 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 120,930 of 120,937    |
|    Alan to Joel W. Crump    |
|    Re: Garbage In Garbage Out    |
|    06 Mar 26 12:43:27    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2026-03-05 14:22, Joel W. Crump wrote:       > On 3/5/2026 5:12 PM, Alan wrote:       >       >>>>>> Exactly. To get Mac Mini performance from an established OEM...       >>>>>>       >>>>>> ...you need to pay Mac Mini prices.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Thank you for being at least this honest. 🙂       >>>>>       >>>>> HP is irrelevant to anything, and yet it is the brand I bought for       >>>>> a laptop.       >>>>       >>>> At least she had the balls (Ironic, isn't it?) to address the question.       >>>       >>> You're seriously trippin', Alan, it's a joke to think about getting a       >>> mini PC from HP, today. The form factor isn't even really       >>> comparable. The basic point I made is sound, if you aren't       >>> hallucinating massive advantage from CPU alone (this point really       >>> *is* sometimes comparable to OEM PCs, which is what Apple is       >>> competing with on *price*), the Apple is going to cost more and more       >>> to overtake the real specs of what I have.       >>       >> Dude...give it up.       >>       >> You bought components and assembled a crappy POS mini PC...       >       >       > Um, no, it was assembled in China by a non-OEM manufacturer. That's       > part of the whole point of this, assembling PCs is for gamers and other       > high-demand uses, your precious Apple hardware requires $1000+       > investment to get anything of the kind.       >       > Face it, my points stand.              Face it: you bought a POS.              >       >       >> ...and then by implication claimed that it was equivalent to a Mac       >> Mini, but cost "far less".       >       >       > I didn't claim equivalence. I claimed better value.              Far less performance for far less cost ISN'T "better value".              >       >       >> Truth is: it costs "far less" because it IS far less.       >       >       > It isn't.              It really is.              But I'm game for running benchmarks on my M3 MacBook Air against your       machine.              >       >       >> And when challenged to show a mini PC you can just buy from an OEM       >> ready-to-use...       >>       >> ...you completely caved.       >       >       > What wasn't "ready-to-use" about mine?       It's the nature of the supplier with yours.              It's fly-by-night manufacturing from China with no real chance to get it       serviced under warranty.              That puts it in a very different class than machines from OEMs such as       Apple, HP, Dell, Lenovo, Acer, ASUS.              Find a machine from one of the companies that is actually in the same       business as Apple that gives the performance of a Mac Mini for "far less".              The fact that Apple doesn't choose to sell cheap, low-end junk doesn't       make the value of their systems less.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca