Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.cbm    |    Discussion about Commodore micros    |    53,866 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 52,227 of 53,866    |
|    Shaun Bebbington to Whammo    |
|    Re: C64 BASIC - what's faster INT() or %    |
|    16 Apr 18 14:29:27    |
      From: shaun@square-circle.co.uk              On Monday, 16 April 2018 22:20:51 UTC+1, Whammo wrote:       > > Other than less typing throughout the program (where you might have lots       of repeated random number generation in this example), are there any benefits       to using CBM functions? Does it save bytes overall would be perhaps one that I       could think of.       > >       > > Many thanks,       > >       > > Shaun.       >       > Other than that, it's faster to inline code than to define a function.              Thanks for the info.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca