From: tim@streater.me.uk   
      
   On 13 Feb 2024 at 15:13:13 GMT, "Bob Latham"  wrote:   
      
   > In article ,   
   >    TimS  wrote:   
   >> On 13 Feb 2024 at 09:50:25 GMT, "Bob Latham"    
   wrote:   
   >   
   >>> In article ,   
   >>>    Lawrence D'Oliveiro  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Online misinformation is a whole new can of worms.   
   >>>   
   >>> Who decides which is misinformation and which is censoring the   
   >>> truth?   
   >>>   
   >>> During covid we were continuously told this and that were   
   >>> "misinformation" or a conspiracy theory. Someone decided.   
   >   
   >> Well, you figure it out.   
   >   
   > I do remember a tremendous number of people demanding all sorts of   
   > extreme actions against those that didn't want the vaccine. It opened   
   > my eyes to how quickly normal people could become unhinged and   
   > barbaric. People should be able to decide if they want the medication   
   > or not, extreme pressure placed on people was disgusting.   
      
   Remember Typhoid Mary. And then there was the MMR nonsense, as a result of   
   which measles is now on the increase.   
      
   > video) the manufacturer Pfizer if I recall correctly, said that no   
   > testing of transmission was ever done. There was never any basis for   
   > the madness. Some have since apologised most have not, most notably   
   > the unhinged media.   
      
   Why would you test transmission, for a vaccine? It would never occur to me for   
   a moment to imagine that a vaccine would affect transmission. What a vaccine   
   does is prime your immune system so that, when you get infected, you beat off   
   the infection double-quick, or at any rate only have a low-grade infection.   
      
   > Certainly I can't think of anyone I know that hasn't had covid, not   
   > one. A good proportion have had it twice and some 3 times. I don't   
   > know anyone who didn't have the first 3 jabs at least.   
      
   Yes, I know a number of people who've had it more than once.   
      
   > I'm 90% sure that the vaccine does not affect transmission.   
      
   That is so obvs I can't even believe people might dicsuss it.   
      
   > They *may* help if you get infected not seen enough data.   
   > Vaccines have caused many people serious injury.   
      
   Here you are exaggerating.   
      
   > Masks even N95 masks are useless they're just theatre.   
   > Asymptomatic transmission was never a serious factor, I will not   
   > claim it didn't happen but for the most part it was propaganda from   
   > the nudge units.   
   >   
   > PCR testing in the UK used double the sensible levels of   
   > amplification cycles. People who should know said you could find   
   > anything in anyone with that level of amplification.   
   >   
   > Remember the videos from China of people dropping dead at bus stops.   
      
   I don't waste time looking at random internet videos, so, no.   
      
   >> We were told the vaccines were coming, and they did,   
   >   
   > Yes, remarkably quickly, too quickly.   
      
   I've no idea what this means.   
      
   > My wife and I had the first 3 jabs. Had we known then what we think   
   > we know now, including what happened to us, we would not have done so.   
      
   What is it you think you now know?   
      
   --   
   Tim   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)