From: address@is.invalid   
      
   mm0fmf,   
      
   > This SRB: Standard Rudy Behaviour   
   >   
   > Look up his previous questions and replies in the archives. He'll ask a   
   > question, people make suggestions, he'll not find any of the suggestions   
   > acceptable or there'll be extra information provided after the suggestions   
   > that makes the situation different. And it goes on for a while. Lather,   
   > rinse, repeat.   
      
   You forget to mention the part where I, /way/ to often, have to tell poster   
   that what they offer isn't what I specifically asked for in the first post -   
   or worse, offering work-arounds which I already mentioned in that first post   
   and not wanted to use.   
      
   ... and than try to make it sound as if its all my fault, and sometimes as a   
   result, as with you, bear a (life-long?) grudge.   
      
   Kid, I've encountered too many "helpfull" people who just skipped the   
   question and pretty-much demanded that I should accept their work-arounds as   
   *the* solution.  Others who claimed all kinds of things, but could, when   
   pressed for it, not come up with any kind of substanciation, let alone   
   proof, for any of it.   
      
   Its also remarkable (not really) that you make a claim of wrongdoing, but am   
   not supporting that claim in any way.   Nothing by anything in this thread,   
   not by linking to any other one*.  I know, I know.  Putting your mouth where   
   your money is is /dangerous/, as you could be proven wrong (like the last   
   time?). :-)   
      
   * just a "go find yourself what the proof of my claim is" dismissing   
   handwaving.  Something rather dishonest those "knights of claim-a-lot" seem   
   to grocer in ...   
      
   Regards,   
   Rudy Wieser   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)