From: ldo@nz.invalid   
      
   On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 22:45:45 +0100, Pancho wrote:   
      
   > One assumes time is well ordered, so even if I don't know what the least   
   > century is, I know there was one.   
      
   Integers are well ordered, but there is no least integer.   
      
   All we want, I think, is a zero point far enough back that there is less   
   real-world need to deal with negative time points.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)