From: tnp@invalid.invalid   
      
   On 28/08/2025 19:05, Chris Green wrote:   
   > The Natural Philosopher  wrote:   
   >> On 28/08/2025 17:34, Scott Alfter wrote:   
   >>> In article , Chris Green     
   wrote:   
   >>>> I have upgraded my Pi 4B from bookworm to trixie and, while most   
   >>>> things work fine, my gpiod code in Python is completely broken.  Can   
   >>>> anyone confirm that everything has changed a lot or am I going mad?   
   >>>   
   >>> I noticed that when I tried updating a RPi 4 + Geekworm X728 system   
   >>> yesterday.  The scripts that talk to the X728 (using rpi-lgpio instead of   
   >>> rpi-gpio) were completely broken.  I'm trying to rework them to use   
   >>> gpiozero, hoping that it might be a better-supported system for the long   
   >>> term.   
   >>>   
   >> It's probably some rearrangement of the /sys hierarchy.   
   >>   
   >> At some level the C library gpio  functions should still work...   
   >>   
   > OP here, yes, I'm not going mad.  There are major changes between the   
   > i.6.x and 2.x versions of python3-libgpiod.  The trouble is that   
   > finding out about it all is very difficult because there are so many   
   > different python wrappers for gpiod and this makes searching very   
   > frustrating.   
   >   
   > The best I've found so far is the 'source':-   
   >      https://github.com/brgl/libgpiod/blob/master/bindings/python/README.md   
   >   
   > It has some Python examples but the coding style is very odd and makes   
   > it difficult to follow what's going on IMHO.   
   >   
   Can't help. I never use python.   
      
   --   
   WOKE is an acronym... Without Originality, Knowledge or Education.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)