From: ldo@nz.invalid   
      
   On Sun, 7 Sep 2025 08:29:21 -0000 (UTC), Jimmy Logan wrote:   
      
   > On 2025-09-07, Lawrence D’Oliveiro  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> On Sat, 6 Sep 2025 18:10:52 -0000 (UTC), Jimmy Logan wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> The other end of of the spectrum would be hand crafted chroot ...   
   >>   
   >> chroot is useless for proper isolation.   
   >   
   > You're right, chroot can never be considered a secure isolation, but   
   > for separating 'service packages' from 'host os packages', might be   
   > enough, I mean, service running in chroot would not be "less secure"   
   > than running it from the host, agree?   
      
   Containers would be more reliable.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)