XPost: comp.os.linux.misc   
   From: usenet@andyburns.uk   
      
   c186282 wrote:   
      
   > If monitoring 'emergency vehicles/installations'   
   >    is critical, maybe consider something using lower   
   >    frequencies than wi-fi ???   
      
   Nah, it was mostly "for interest" to gather a few more values from kit   
   that's already being monitored. Someone else mentioned water (presumably   
   as rain) don't forget the fire appliances carry around their own water,   
   but hopefully it's low down for CoG reasons, while the access points are   
   mounted higher up.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)