Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.tandy    |    Life is dandy cuz you're gettin a Tandy!    |    5,684 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,839 of 5,684    |
|    Michael J. Mahon to Darren Salt    |
|    Re: Crosspost: Did the cpu influence the    |
|    30 Dec 05 13:41:57    |
      XPost: comp.sys.sinclair, comp.sys.atari.8bit, comp.sys.apple2       XPost: comp.sys.cbm       From: mjmahon@aol.com              Darren Salt wrote:              > True. But the *layout* of the display memory was certainly influenced by the       > CPU.              In the case of the Apple II, the (somewhat unusual) layout of display       memory was a consequence of using the video refresh to accomplish the       refresh of the DRAMs.              The result is that no special refresh circuitry is used, and, since       all video accesses occur on the alternate half-cycles not used by       the processor, there is never any interference with the processor       for video or DRAM refresh.              A little cleverness simplifies a lot.              -michael              Music synthesis for 8-bit Apple II's!       Home page: http://members.aol.com/MJMahon/              "The wastebasket is our most important design       tool--and it is seriously underused."              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca