Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.tandy    |    Life is dandy cuz you're gettin a Tandy!    |    5,684 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,521 of 5,684    |
|    Michael Black to The Questarian    |
|    Re: Classic Computer Preservation    |
|    17 Apr 07 04:19:25    |
      XPost: comp.sys.cbm       From: et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA              The Questarian (J.bielak@REMOVEMETOSEND.Questarian.com) writes:       > The other day I was looking at an old PET 8032 and a Model III and I       > thought, "Hmmm, you know they'd make pretty cool retro PC cases." Now,       > before anyone yells at me about ruining a classic machine, please know       > that I'd never gut a functional classic computer just to turn in into       > some generic PC... but it did raise something some interesting       > preservationist questions in my mind, and I wondered what the people in       > the community might have to say:       >       Things get bought and used and modified and thrown out. If they didn't,       they'd have no purpose in the first place. They are plentiful, and sometime       after their initial introduction, they become cheap because nobody wants       them. Their purpose has passed. They sit in the top shelf of the       closet, or they are sold off, or tossed out.              But then at some point down the road, that useage etc means only a       relative few exist. The price and demand goes up. Obviously if       there are a relative few remaining, those who want one have to fight       over those that remain, driving prices up. And often when it gets       to the point where they have become scarce, the people who had       them originally, or wanted them, start getting nostalgic for them,       having tossed them out or given them away decades before. The scarcity       doesn't cause this interest, it's just enough time has passed so       they desire them again.              If you anticipate things being valuable, they usually aren't. Look       at all the kids in recent decades who go off to the comic store and       buy the latest "graphic novels" and then put them in plastic, because       they think they will have value in the future. It's not even clear       if they actually read them. Useage winnows out the stock, but hoarding       means the stock remains, eternally.              That said, at some point things start tipping in a different direction.       I can remember in the early seventies being able to get all kinds of       tube radio equipment for nothing, because nobody wanted it at the time,       it was obsolete and there was better stuff. Nowadays, the same stuff       is desired by people collecting it. And some of those people would       be the ones who tossed them out or gave them away decades ago, and       now want to revisit the past. Others couldn't afford the stuff, and       merely drooled over the ads, and now they have money, so they want the       stuff.              And some grumble about "the mess made in the old days with modifications",       which is indeed a valid point when you are looking back. Because those       modifications made the equipment non-standard, and may even have       done damage. But, at the time they were modified, it was to get some       more use out of the unit (real or perceived) and nobody was thinking       of the future (and they shouldn't have). It's only in retrospect       that people can grumble about the stuff not being kept in pristine       condition.              The issue becomes more important the further into the future you move.       Antique radio collectors (as opposed to collectors of mere tube radios)       are farther in the future, and many when doing repairs will not use       non-standard parts. If they really are unable to get similar parts,       they'll do things like embed new capacitors in the wrappers of the original       capacitors. They've long past the stage where the radios were in       everyday use (where keeping things running might have meant just       using anything), to the point where "keeping things original" is often       important. Some will simply not use the radios, because that will       put stress on the parts, and if the parts go they want only original       replacements.              Home computers are a relatively recent thing, though on the other hand,       unlike old table radios, their useful life ran out decades ago. A tube       radio could still receive radio, even if a solid state one had instant       on and used less power and was cooler and whatever. But my KIM-1 became       obsolete when I could afford an OSI Superboard II three years later, and       that became obsolete when I got my Radio Shack Color Computer 3 years       after that, and so on. I kept getting better computers because they       did more, and up to a certain point, the computers were not capable       of a certain level of capability. I couldn't use that KIM-1 for text       editing, not without adding a lot of external circuitry, that OSI could       barely be used for the task and really still needed extra circuitry.              I can't imagine anyone is really using an old home computer (say 25       years old or more) as a main computer. They were too limited, and       far in the past, plus, you can get all kinds of better computers for       nothing nowadays. Hence, they are either being kept for historical       reasons, or being run on occasion to run an specific older program       that is part of the experience of running an old computer.              Thus "keeping things running" is not about continuing to use a computer       to maximize the return on the money you spent on it originally. If       I was still using my Mac LC (I did use it up till mid-2001 and two       computers ago), I would not hesitate to modify it if needed, because       it was my main computer up till that point, and it was a different       game. But now that it's out of operation, the only reason for keeping       it, at least when I finally clear out the hard drive, is for historical       purposes. And historical means keeping things intact.              Talk to the antique radio collectors, and they will talk about making       do, but they will also talk about ensuring it doesn't mess with the       original. So, the equivalent for computers would be that if the       CRT dies, and a replacement is either too expensive or impossible       to get, then you figure out a means of connecting an external monitor,       and do it in a fashion that is reversible. Thus if/when a CRT appears,       the unit can be put back to it's original state.              Some might get solid-state replacements for harder to get tubes, and       then keep the original tubes taped inside the cabinet or something like       that. The computer equivalent might be to put in easy to get 3.5"       drives (and just having the software treat them like 35 or 40 track       drives that the 5.25" were), and then carefully storing the 5.25" drives.       Thus, the computer can still be used, but without putting more wear       on the mechanical drives that may not be available for replacement.       And even if the 5.25" drives fail, a collector might keep them, because       even when the computer has died and there is no hope, the original       drives will keep it cosmetically intact, so distant descendants can say       "this is what computers looked like in great grandpa's day".              The field of antique radios is what old computers will be down the line.       Whatever should be done now, one can at least see a bit of the future       by examining the area of antique radios.               Michael              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca