Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.tandy    |    Life is dandy cuz you're gettin a Tandy!    |    5,684 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 5,197 of 5,684    |
|    Charles Richmond to Knut    |
|    Re: COCO Question    |
|    06 Apr 10 23:45:43    |
      From: frizzle@tx.rr.com              Knut wrote:       > On 07.04.2010 01:30, Charles Richmond wrote:       >> Knut wrote:       >>> On 01.04.2010 19:04, Herbert Johnson wrote:       >>>> On Apr 1, 7:17 am, (Bill Gunshannon) wrote:       >>>>> "Wesley" writes:       >>>>>       >>>>>> If you can come up with something practical and inexpensive to       >>>>>> connect an       >>>>>> IDE drive to a computer with an ST-506 (assuming here that ST506 =       >>>>>> MFM)       >>>>>> interface, you would have some interested folks.       >>>>>       >>>>> If it were doable at all, it would be so complicated you might as well       >>>>> just use another computer. There is nothing common at all between the       >>>>> two interfaces. Easier to throw out the ST506 card and just interface       >>>>> to the bus of the computer.       >>>>>       >>>>> bill       >>>>       >>>> From my experiences in the XT/AT era, MFM drive formats were not       >>>> consistent from controller to controller brand/model. A drive used       >>>> with one brand/model MFM controller, was not readable by another.       >>>> People today are used to moving IDE/ATA or SATA drives around without       >>>> problems. They think "if it fits, it ships" - that is, if you can       >>>> connect computer A to thing B, "the computer" can read it. Not so, in       >>>> 1980's and earlier computing. So, even a direct interface would be a       >>>> problem, one of proper format, possibly even "low level" format too.       >>>>       >>>> herb johnson       >>>> retrotechnology.com       >>>       >>> The MFM controller is a very different beast from IDE. An MFM       >>> controller needs to be paired with the drive. This is done by low       >>> level formatting the drive. It is actually advised also to low level       >>> format the drive regularly (would be done with tools like spinrite).       >>> This is so because timing critical components are on the MFM controller.       >>>       >>> The trick they did with IDE was to move all the timing critical stuff       >>> onto the drive and to recalibrate without needing the user to initiate       >>> it. Therefore the IDE interface is quite simple and the drive will       >>> work with (almost) any IDE interface...       >>>       >>> For a while there were also RLE drives, these were better MFM drives       >>> utilizing run-length-encoding so data was compressed on the drive. One       >>> shouldn't low-level format RLE drives either.       >>>       >>> We were used to low-level format regularly with MFM drives so it was       >>> quite different when IDE came and the drives shouldn't be low-level       >>> formatted. :-)       >>>       >>> MFM drives needed to be "parked" before moving the drive (pc) using a       >>> small program. IDE drives do this automatically (moving heads outside       >>> the writable area).       >>>       >>       >> Some MFM drives require manual parking of the heads, and some do       >> auto-park. In particular, I have an old 40 meg drive from a PC that uses       >> the spin-down energy to generate power to auto-park the heads.       >>       >       > I will stretch to "Most MFM drives require manual parking..." and here       > better safe than sorry is a good idea.       >       > Actually parking is only required if you need to move the drive, or the       > pc it is in.       >       > What brand is it? I think I also have seen such a beast, but it was not       > common, probably expensive. I think it was in the era when IDE, SCSI,       > MFM and RLE drives coexisted.       >       > I always park MFM drives before turning off a machine and I have several       > (Olivetti M24, HP Vectra QS/20 etc. not used very often use though).       > Most of my MFM drives are 20MB. Some are really slow to spin up but they       > still work nicely.       >              ISTR that the auto-parking MFM drive I had was a Seagate 251-N.                     --       +----------------------------------------+       | Charles and Francis Richmond |       | |       | plano dot net at aquaporin4 dot com |       +----------------------------------------+              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca