TZUTC: -0500
MSGID: 1383.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d09b874
REPLY: 1373.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d07371b
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
BBSID: CAPCITY2
CHRS: ASCII 1
FORMAT: flowed
RR>> I have always said both the cloud and AI are bad.

MP>> I do not use cloud storage persoanlly, so don't be pointing fingers here!

MP>I don't (on purpose anyway) here, either.  My guess is that they want the
  >extra storage that "the cloud" is using for AI and are therefore blaming
  >cloud users for what is really being caused by increased AI usage... energy
  >and water usage, etc.

If I recall this was more about water usage than electricity use but
suggestied that less data stored on servers would reduce the amount
of water needed to cool them. I'd think a big part of the water part
of it would depend on if coolant is recycled or just dumped with new
water coming in to replace it, and where that water is coming from.
Pretty much anything could be used but I suppose if the servers are
in a city then it's a huge waste of clean, processed, drinking water.

I half wonder if people mining Bitcoin aren't a bigger problem
than cloud storage..

Personally, I do use a cloud account for files I need to transfer
between multiple units or files I temporarily park there for others
to download, but I doubt I have 5 meg of total data on there..

---
 * SLMR Rob  * Sometimes you're the windshield..Sometimes you're the bug
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 114 206 300 307 317 400 426 428
SEEN-BY: 229/470 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200
SEEN-BY: 396/45 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35
PATH: 2320/105 229/426