TZUTC: -0500
MSGID: 1395.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d0c55bf
REPLY: 1532.consprcy@1:218/700 2d09f042
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
BBSID: CAPCITY2
CHRS: ASCII 1
FORMAT: flowed
KW>The reports make it sound like the water isn't recycled and that the water
is
  >sed" by the data center, as if they're talking about continuous use. Whether
  >t's accurate or not, I don't know. You'd think you could cool the water
passi
  >y and recirculate it, but then you're adding more radiant heat into the
envir
  >ent.

KW>If water is running through a closed system you wouldn't think there'd be an
  >ue with treating it and releasing it back into the water supply, but I'm
sure
  >'s not worth the decrease in net shareholder value.

Yes, I touched on that in a previous message.. I wouldn't think that
water used for cooling would be polluted to any great extent, but
you are still pulling it out of fresh drinking water in same cases
and possibly dumping it into the sewage treatment plants.

---
 * SLMR Rob  * There are only 2 valid opinions - mine and the wrong one.
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 114 206 300 307 317 400 426 428
SEEN-BY: 229/470 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200
SEEN-BY: 396/45 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35
PATH: 2320/105 229/426