TZUTC: -0500
MSGID: 1445.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d143e97
REPLY: 1:396/45.29@fidonet 23c7db0c
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
BBSID: CAPCITY2
CHRS: ASCII 1
FORMAT: flowed
RM> Years ago I saw a study where environmental scientists looked at
RM> what number of people the whole world could support at a level
RM> where nature would totally be unharmed by humans, a number that
RM> could survive easily and do no damage.

RM> The number they came up with was about 50 million people, so
RM> maybe what we need to fix things is better birth control..   B)

AA>There are reports that populations are already on the decline.

Yes, mostly in the wealthier countries though, as I mentioned in
the previous message to Mike.

Better off people don't seem to have more than 1 or 2 children
at the most these days and it looks like some of the overcrowded
poorer countries are starting to see that it costs so much to
raise kids that they have fewer now to give them a better chance
of survival, finding enough food and getting a job and an
education at some level.

They say that the cost to raise a child in Canada to age 17
ranges from $238,000 for low income families to over $400,000
in better off families so having 4 or 5 kids can really cut
into your retirement funds...   B)

But there are still a lot of countries where birth control is
either unavailable or illegal and some religious orders trying
to keep the population growing to add to their supporters.

---
 * SLMR Rob  * The sooner you fall behind, the more time to catch up
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470
SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45
SEEN-BY: 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35
PATH: 2320/105 229/426