Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1714  |
|  Mike Powell to RUG RAT  |
|  Re: EU rejects claims of  |
|  31 Aug 25 09:47:14  |
 TZUTC: -0500 MSGID: 1462.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d199c28 REPLY: 1:135/250@fidonet 68b3b42e PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0 BBSID: CAPCITY2 CHRS: ASCII 1 FORMAT: flowed > more in criminal cases. Expanded in the early 20s to make taking pictures of > "women" in swim suits at a public beach. Making it a sex crime if you being > there with a camera made them feel uncomfortable. Penalties include large > fines, jail, and or chemical castration. Beaches are a good place to take pictures of many other things... lighthouses, sunsets... that have nothing to do with whoever is there. I usually try to ignore other people... being tagged for a sex crime just because my camera makes them uncomfortable is going way too far. > "Defamation using truth". Speaking ill of someone, even if true can lead to > large fines and jail. So if they do something bad, and you just tell what they did without opinion, it could be defamation? Consider the state of things right now, I am surprised we don't have one like this. > A lot of these laws do nothing to protect the public but are used by the > business conglomarates (Chibol), or government officals to hide their dirty > business in the shawdows, or stifle public commnet. Figures. Mike * SLMR 2.1a * Anything good is either illegal, immoral or fattening. --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105) SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700 SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470 SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35 PATH: 2320/105 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]