Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1715  |
|  Rug Rat to Mike Powell  |
|  Re: EU rejects claims of cens  |
|  31 Aug 25 12:09:47  |
 MSGID: 1:135/250@fidonet 68b48ff0 PID: C-NET AMIGA BBS 5.36b On Sun 31-Aug-2025 9:47a, Mike Powell@1:2320/105.0 said to Rug Rat: MP> Beaches are a good place to take pictures of many other things... MP> lighthouses, MP> sunsets... that have nothing to do with whoever is there. I usually try MP> to MP> ignore other people... being tagged for a sex crime just because my camera MP> makes them uncomfortable is going way too far. As a photographer and blogger (Non monetized), there are many times that including a subject in the photo showing their reaction, immerserion, or what have you into the scene itself tells a story, outside of me just rambling away. You are in public, there is no expectation of privacy. Take your feelings and go home and hide in your bubble. While some of the methods "1st amemdment auditors" go to, to get the content for their Youtube/Facebook content justified is questionable. I fully support what they are doing. I have seen the flip side, and it is not someplace we want to go. Furthermore, these women chose to wear what they did when they stepped outside. They obviously don't feel uncomfortable about it, just because I capture it with a camera should not put the onous of shame, embarrasment, etc. on me! If they don't want friends, family, coworkers, etc. to accidently stumble upon it, perhaps they should think about it before hand. Yeah I know I will get some "womens lib" person out there all in a tizzy, but I really am beyond caring.. ** On a side note. If you are taking unsolicited photos / videos for a blog / vlog etc, and that post or video is monetized, does that cross the line into needing a photo/video release? That would be a good debate topic MP> So if they do something bad, and you just tell what they did without MP> opinion, it could be defamation? Consider the state of things right now, MP> I MP> am surprised we don't have one like this. If you say it to them and only them, you are in the clear (Though being Korea, I am sure there are other laws they can get you on.). Though with or without oppinion if you saw something to a third party that "defames" them, you might want a lawyer on retainer. Other part of Korean law that comes into play with some of these (Though more and more laws are doing away with this...)... If the accused enteres into an agreement called a "Personal Appology Settlement." Which usually includes an appology without admitting guilt and a payment. The "agreived" will drop the charges or the prosecutor will decide not to procede with prosecution.. On one hand it saves the court a lot of time, but on the other hand opend the door for legalized extortion. Rug Rat (Brent Hendricks) Blog and Forums - www.catracing.org IMAGE BBS! 3.0 - bbs.catracing.org 6400 C-Net Amiga BBS - bbs.catracing.org 6840 --- CNet/5 * Origin: The Rat's Den BBS (1:135/250) SEEN-BY: 1/120 18/0 105/81 106/201 116/116 123/0 25 126 180 525 755 SEEN-BY: 123/3001 3002 4040 128/187 129/14 305 135/0 115 205 220 230 SEEN-BY: 135/250 363 384 385 388 390 391 153/757 7715 154/110 218/700 SEEN-BY: 222/2 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 300 307 317 400 426 SEEN-BY: 229/428 470 664 700 705 250/1 266/512 275/1000 291/111 320/219 SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 712/848 1321 902/26 2320/0 SEEN-BY: 2320/105 304 3634/0 12 24 27 56 57 58 60 5075/35 PATH: 135/250 115 3634/12 2320/105 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]