home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 1722 
 Rob Mccart to MIKE POWELL 
 Re: EU rejects claims of 
 03 Sep 25 08:16:24 
 
TZUTC: -0500
MSGID: 1470.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d1d7b66
REPLY: 1466.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d1afcae
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
BBSID: CAPCITY2
CHRS: ASCII 1
FORMAT: flowed
RR>> ** On a side note.  If you are taking unsolicited photos / videos for a
blo
  >> vlog etc, and that post or video is monetized, does that cross the line
int
  >> needing a photo/video release?  That would be a good debate topic

MP>I would say "yes" so as, at the very least, to cover your own arse.  If
  >they find out your making $$$ on it they will likely want some of the
  >profit.

I would say that any time you use a photo for commercial purposes the
subjects in it should have some share ofit. That's a little different
than random photos for your own use.

MP>That said, several years ago I too several photos and a couple of the
  >locations (one a lighthouse and another a lake cruise) reached out and
  >asked if they could use them to promote their locations.  I said yes even
  >though I am not getting paid.

Did they see the photos at the time or had you posetd them somewhere later?
Probably as you thought, there'd be very little monney to be made there
and you might just feel good that your photos were considered that good.

MP>> If you say it to them and only them, you are in the clear (Though being
Kor
  >> I am sure there are other laws they can get you on.).  Though with or
witho
  >> oppinion if you saw something to a third party that "defames" them, you
mig
  >> want a lawyer on retainer.

I'm not sure if telling the truth about someone, and there's no question
it is true, would be 'defamation'..  Or at least shouldn't be IMHO..  B)

The definition online says defamation falls under two catagories, slander
and libel depending on if it is spoken or written, but they point out
that that refers to making FALSE statements..

---
 * SLMR Rob  * Do not judge a book by its movie!
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470
SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45
SEEN-BY: 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35
PATH: 2320/105 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca