TZUTC: -0500
MSGID: 1478.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d20426f
REPLY: 1472.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d1d8c50
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
BBSID: CAPCITY2
CHRS: ASCII 1
FORMAT: flowed
RM>> Did they see the photos at the time or had you posted them somewhere
later?
  >> Probably as you thought, there'd be very little monney to be made there
  >> and you might just feel good that your photos were considered that good.

MP>I had posted them to FB.  It was somewhat flattering as I never really
  >considered myself to be that much of a photographer.  In the case of the
  >lighthouse, that is mostly/completely a volunteer group that runs that
  >organization.  I figured if it helped them get folks interested in a visit,
  >it was a good thing.  When I visited, they were not yet to the point of
  >opening for tours (it wasn't even staffed... I just walked up, took a few
  >photos, and enjoyed the view).  They were gearing up for future tours when
  >they asked.

MP>In the case of the lake cruise, the photos were of things you probably
  >wouldn't see unless you were on the cruise or owned/hired your own boat.
  >They might make a little money off using them.

Yes, in cases like that there's not much monetary issue and you are
helping the tourists as much as the cruise ship if you show interesting
things there so, it's all good..

Never been to a lighthouse, although I've sailed by a nearby one
a few times. When I was fairly young I once climbed to the cabin
at the top of a fire tower. Nice view.. top of a high hill and
top of a 100+ foot tower climbing up a simple ladder. That wasn't
illegal other than the the fact that you were not supposed to do
it under a certain age, and I was a couple of years younger than
that but was fortunately tall enough to get away with it. There
was a ranger in the tower at the time BTW..

RM>> The definition online says defamation falls under two catagories, slander
  >> and libel depending on if it is spoken or written, but they point out
  >> that that refers to making FALSE statements..

MP>That is how I think it should be applied.

Yes, that makes more sense but as Rug Rat said, losing 'face' in Korea
is a much bigger deal there than here. It sounds like the law was
made there originally to cover false claims, but was expanded to cover
just about anything.

---
 * SLMR Rob  * Inebriated amateur radio operator - Ham on Rye
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470
SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45
SEEN-BY: 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35
PATH: 2320/105 229/426