Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1839  |
|  Mike Powell to All  |
|  The vote on Chat Control  |
|  14 Oct 25 08:31:10  |
 TZUTC: -0500 MSGID: 1596.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d538cda PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0 BBSID: CAPCITY2 CHRS: ASCII 1 FORMAT: flowed The vote on Chat Control has been postponed, but the fight isnt over yet here's what we know Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 15:21:02 +0000 Description: The move comes as Germany officially joined the opposition, making it impossible again to reach the needed majority. Yet, the EU is still working on the proposal. FULL STORY The EU's plan to monitor all citizens' private chats remains far from becoming law for now. EU lawmakers have postponed a crucial vote on the controversial Child Sexual Abuse Regulation (CSAR), which was scheduled for October 14 between the EU Council and the EU Justice Minister. The move comes as Germany joined the opposition on Wednesday, October 7, after arguing that chat monitoring must remain taboo and the government "will not agree" to the proposal. Germany's decision is likely to be why Chat Control has failed to attract the needed majority, yet again. As per the Danish iteration of the bill, all messaging apps operating in Europe would be required to scan all URLs, pictures, and videos shared by their users in the lookout for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) even when the messages are encrypted. Crucially, experts have long argued that such scanning isn't compatible with how encryption works. Encryption is the technology that Signal, WhatsApp, ProtonMail, and even the best VPN apps use to scramble the content of users' messages into an unreadable form, preventing unauthorized access. The CSAR proposal has been attracting strong criticism for its implications on privacy and security, sparking a fierce debate around Europe. Signals vice-president for global affairs even compared this mandatory client-side scanning to " malware on your device ." Over 40 European privacy-first tech companies have also warned against the impact on the EU's digital sovereignty . More than 500 cryptography experts also signed an open letter arguing that the bill still fails to address concerns around encryption, indiscriminate surveillance, and accuracy. Vote delayed, but Chat Control still on the table This isn't the first time the EU has disagreed on Chat Control a proposal that first appeared on the EU agenda in 2022. Yet, the bill keeps coming back to the lawmaker's table. It is then only fair to assume that, despite the matter disappearing from the October 14 agenda , the vote has only been delayed, and Chat Control is set to return to the EU Council soon. According to former MEP for the German Pirate Party and digital rights jurist, Patrick Breyer, "EU governments continue to work on the proposal," he wrote on X . The next meeting may occur in a couple of months as, Breyer explains, EU interior ministers are set to meet again on December 6 and 7. On a similar note is X, who commented from its Global Government Affairs account: "This delay marks an important step in protecting secure communications, but the fight is not over! Member States are still negotiating the provisions of the proposal with the goal to bring it back for a vote." Also, President of the non-profit Signal Foundation, Meredith Whittaker, isn't ready to fully celebrate this win for privacy. "We expect closed-door negotiations to engage in rhetorical arbitrage claiming to support privacy by using word games and bespoke definitions while in practice undermining it," wrote Whittaker on X . Something is clear, though. Whittaker said, "You can't create a backdoor that only lets the 'good guys' in. However they're dressed up, these proposals create cybersecurity loopholes that hackers and hostile nations are eagerly waiting to exploit." ====================================================================== Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/the-vote-on-chat-control-ha s-been-postponed-but-the-fight-isnt-over-yet-heres-what-we-know $$ --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105) SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700 SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470 SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35 PATH: 2320/105 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]