TZUTC: -0500
MSGID: 1624.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d60cda1
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
BBSID: CAPCITY2
CHRS: ASCII 1
FORMAT: flowed
Think you can trust ChatGPT and Gemini to give you the news? Here's why you
might want to think again

Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2025 16:39:57 +0000

Description:
AI assistants routinely misrepresent news, raising concerns about
misinformation and public trust in the digital age.

FULL STORY

When you ask an AI assistant about news and current events you might expect a
detached, authoritative answer. But according to a sweeping international
study led by the BBC and coordinated by the European Broadcasting Union 
(EBU), nearly half the time, those answers are wrong, misleading, or just
plain made up (anyone who's dealt with the nonsense of Apple's AI-written
headlines can relate). 

The report dug into how ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, and
Perplexity handle news queries across 14 languages in 18 countries. The 
report analyzed over 3,000 individual responses provided by the AI tools.
Professional journalists from 22 public media outlets evaluated each answer
for accuracy, sourcing, and how well it discerned news from opinion. 

The results were bleak for those relying on AI for their news. The report
found that 45% of all answers had a significant issue, 31% had sourcing
problems, and 20% were simply inaccurate. This isnt just a matter of one or
two embarrassing mistakes, like confusing the Prime Minister of Belgium with
the frontman of a Belgian pop group. The research found deep, structural
issues with how these assistants process and deliver news, regardless of
language, country, or platform.

In some languages, the assistants outright hallucinated details. In others,
they attributed quotes to outlets that hadnt published anything even close to
what was being cited. Context was often missing, with the assistants 
sometimes giving simplistic or misleading overviews instead of crucial 
nuance. In the worst cases, that could change the meaning of an entire news
story. 

Not every assistant was equally problematic. Gemini misfired in a staggering
76% of responses, mostly due to missing or poor sourcing. 

Unlike a Google search, which lets users sift through a dozen sources, a
chatbot's answer often feels final. It reads with authority and clarity,
giving the impression that its been fact-checked and edited, when in fact it
may be little more than a fuzzy collage of half-remembered summaries. 

Thats part of why the stakes are so high. And why even partnerships like 
those between ChatGPT and The Washington Post can't solve the problem
entirely.

AI news literacy 

The problem is obvious, especially given how quickly AI assistants are
becoming the go-to interface for news. The study cited the 2025 Reuters
Institutes Digital News Report estimate that 7% of all online news consumers
now use an AI assistant to get their information, and 15% of those under 25.
People are already asking AI to explain the world to them, and the AI is
getting the world wrong a disturbing amount. 

If youve ever asked ChatGPT, Gemini, or Copilot to summarize a news event,
youve probably seen one of these imperfect answers in action. ChatGPT's
difficulties with searching for the news are well known at this point. But
maybe you didnt even notice. Thats part of the problem: these tools are often
wrong with such fluency that it doesnt feel like a red flag. Thats why media
literacy and ongoing scrutiny are essential. 

To try to improve the situation, the EBU and its partners released a News
Integrity in AI Assistants Toolkit, which serves as an AI literacy starter
pack designed to help developers and journalists alike. It outlines both what
makes a good AI response and what kinds of failures users and media watchdogs
should be looking for. 

Even as companies like OpenAI and Google race ahead with faster, slicker
versions of their assistants, these reports show why transparency and
accountability are so important. That doesnt mean AI cant be helpful, even 
for curating the endless firehose of news. It does mean that, for now, it
should come with a disclaimer. And even if it doesn't, dont assume the
assistant knows best  check your sources, and stick to the most reliable 
ones...

======================================================================
Link to news story:
https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/think-you-can-trust-chatgpt-
and-gemini-to-give-you-the-news-heres-why-you-might-want-to-think-again

$$
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470
SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45
SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35
PATH: 2320/105 229/426