TZUTC: -0500
MSGID: 1667.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d6f47ee
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
BBSID: CAPCITY2
CHRS: ASCII 1
FORMAT: flowed
Younger workers are skipping meetings - and trusting AI to take notes for them

Date:
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 19:28:00 +0000

Description:
AI note-taker users are apparently more successful in their careers, but 
where do companies draw the line?

FULL STORY

Younger workers are reportedly favoring AI note-taking tools over attending
meetings in person - with many saying this will allow them to focus on the
work that matters. 

New research from Software Finder found one-fifth (19%) of workers now
frequently use AI tools to take meeting notes, with hybrid workers (26%) 
twice as likely to adopt them compared with in-person employees (13%). 

Time savings (69%), reduced manual note-taking (41%) and improved record
accuracy (27%) were highlighted as key benefits, but adopters are also seeing
larger indirect benefits to their careers.

Can AI replace meeting attendees? 

Software Finder's study found frequent AI note-takers are more likely to
receive promotions (28%) than their counterparts (15%), while they also tend
to earn higher salaries on average ($86,000 vs. $67,700). 

Workers are saving over an hour each week just by using AI note-takers, but
the usual concerns remain. Inaccuracy and loss of nuance (48%), privacy
concerns (46%), data security risks (42%) and misinterpretation of tone or
intent (32%) were among the most frequently cited. 

One-quarter also noted an overreliance on AI, with 87% admitting that their
workload would increase if AI note-takers stopped working. Still, 29% of
workers say theyve skipped meetings, leaving it up to AI  something thats 
more common among Gen Z (43%) than millennials (30%). 

Still, not all meetings are created equal, and some are more suited to AI
note-takers than others. Brainstorming sessions (53%), project status and
updates (45%) and strategic planning meetings (43%) are among the most
suitable, with training/onboarding (39%) and team check-ins (37%) better when
a human in present  unsurprisingly. 

Although the data suggests that a shift away from in-person meetings might 
not be a bad thing, with workers able to exploit AI to cut out administrative
work and focus on creative output, its still a line that needs to be 
navigated with care. 

======================================================================
Link to news story:
https://www.techradar.com/pro/younger-workers-are-skipping-meetings-and-trusti
ng-ai-to-take-notes-for-them

$$
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470 664
SEEN-BY: 229/700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45
SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35
PATH: 2320/105 229/426