TZUTC: -0500
MSGID: 1682.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d71eaa9
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
BBSID: CAPCITY2
CHRS: ASCII 1
FORMAT: flowed
Well, that is awkward - MIT Sloan forced to withdraw "absolutely ridiculous"
paper claiming AI played "significant role" in most ransomware attacks

Date:
Wed, 05 Nov 2025 20:24:00 +0000

Description:
MIT Sloan retracts paper linking most ransomware to AI after global experts
condemn exaggerated claims and lack of credible evidence.

FULL STORY

MIT Sloan School of Management has been forced to withdraw a working paper
which claimed AI played a significant role in most ransomware attacks after
widespread criticism from experts. 

The study, co-authored by MIT researchers and executives from Safe Security,
alleged that 80.83 percent of recorded ransomware events were attributed to
threat actors utilizing AI. 

Published earlier in 2025 and later cited by several outlets, the report drew
immediate scrutiny for presenting extraordinary figures with little evidence.

Dubious research 

Among them were prominent security researcher Kevin Beaumont, who described
the paper as absolutely ridiculous, calling its findings, almost complete
nonsense. 

"It describes almost every major ransomware group as using AI  without any
evidence (it's also not true, I monitor many of them)," Beaumont wrote in a
Mastodon thread.

"It even talks about Emotet (which hasn't existed for many years) as being AI
driven,". 

Cybersecurity expert Marcus Hutchins agreed, saying, I burst out laughing at
the title and when I read their methodology, I laughed even harder. 

He also criticized the article for undermining public understanding of 
threats like ransomware and malware removal practices. 

Following the backlash, MIT Sloan removed the paper from its site and 
replaced it with a note saying it was being updated based on some recent
reviews. 

Michael Siegel, one of the authors, confirmed that revisions were underway. 

"We received some recent comments on the working paper and are working as 
fast as possible to provide an updated version, Siegel said. 

The main points of the paper are that the use of AI in ransomware attacks is
increasing, we should find a way to measure it, and there are things 
companies can do now to prepare." 

In simple terms, he claims that the paper does not assert a definitive global
percentage but acts as a warning on how AI might be measured in cyberattacks. 

Even Googles AI-based search assistant dismissed the claim, stating the 
figure was not supported by current data. 

The controversy reflects a growing tension in cybersecurity research, where
enthusiasm for AI can sometimes overtake factual analysis. 

AI has genuine potential in both attack and defense, thus improving 
ransomware protection , automated threat detection, and antivirus systems is 
a good move. 

However, overstating its malicious use risks distorting priorities, 
especially when it is coming from institutions as prominent as MIT Sloan. 

Via The Register 

======================================================================
Link to news story:
https://www.techradar.com/pro/well-that-is-awkward-mit-sloan-forced-to-withdra
w-absolutely-ridiculous-paper-claiming-ai-played-significant-role-in-most-rans
omware-attacks

$$
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470 664
SEEN-BY: 229/700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45
SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35
PATH: 2320/105 229/426