Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2065  |
|  Mike Powell to All  |
|  UK has "no plans" to repl  |
|  11 Dec 25 09:43:59  |
 TZUTC: -0500 MSGID: 1822.consprcy@1:2320/105 2da015cd PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0 BBSID: CAPCITY2 CHRS: ASCII 1 FORMAT: flowed UK has "no plans" to replicate Australia's social media ban (yet) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:16:04 +0000 Description: Australian teens are now locked out of their social media accounts as the under-16s ban goes live. If it proves to work, "we would certainly consider it," said UK Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy. FULL STORY It's been less than 24 hours since Australia's landmark social media ban for under-16s came into effect, and the UK government is already being asked whether it intends to follow suit. However, UK Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy confirmed today (December 10) that the government has "no plans" to replicate the legislation. Speaking on Sky News , Nandy cited concerns about enforceability and the risk that banning access could "push young people into other places" online. However, the door isn't entirely closed. In a separate appearance on BBC Breakfast , Nandy admitted that the government "would certainly consider it," provided there was evidence that it worked and that young people trusted the process. Is age-gating content the right apporach? The UK made headlines earlier this year when it began enforcing the age verification provisions of its Online Safety Act legislation. Under these rules, platforms must ensure users are over 18 before granting access to inappropriate material. This has impacted a wide range of services, from adult sites and dating apps to social media and user-generated content platforms. But the move has sparked backlash. Despite agreeing on the importance of protecting children online, privacy experts and digital rights advocates have strongly criticized mandatory age checks, calling them a dangerous " privacy tradeoff ." These privacy concerns have pushed many Brits towards the best VPNs to bypass age checks. Ofcom has acknowledged the challenge that circumvention tools like VPNs pose and is currently monitoring their use . Given this cat-and-mouse dynamic, it's hardly surprising that officials in the UK are questioning whether Australia's wide-ranging legislation may have an "enforceability" problem. Will banning teens from social media entirely be the next step in the UK? The UK Culture Secretary doesn't seem convinced just yet, but other influential figures are already aligning themselves with Canberra's tougher stance. Talking to PoliticsHome, Joani Reid, chair of the Childrens Online Safety All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG), said: "The principle of it is a fantastic thing, and if it is successful and implemented well, I hope that the government will look at it." We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example:1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service).2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad.We do not support or condone using a VPN service to break the law or conduct illegal activities. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing. ====================================================================== Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/uk-has-no-plans-to-replicat e-australias-social-media-ban-yet $$ --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105) SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700 SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 134 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470 SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35 PATH: 2320/105 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]