TZUTC: -0500
MSGID: 1929.consprcy@1:2320/105 2dc508b9
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
BBSID: CAPCITY2
CHRS: ASCII 1
FORMAT: flowed
New Virginia teen safety law sparks privacy debate and fresh legal challenges

Date:
Wed, 07 Jan 2026 16:43:33 +0000

Description:
The amendment to the VCDPA places strict limits on data collection and usage
hours for minors, but privacy advocates warn that age verification could put
data at risk.

FULL STORY

A new amendment to the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA) has
officially come into effect on January 1st. It mandates social media 
platforms to implement stricter protections for minors, including limitations
on screen time and data collection. 

Under the new rules, digital service providers are prohibited from processing
the personal data of a known minor for the purposes of targeted advertising 
or selling that data without clear parental consent. 

The law also targets "addictive" feed mechanics, requiring platforms to
disable features that encourage infinite scrolling and to implement tools 
that limit the duration of use for minors. 

While the goal is to break the cycle of social media addiction, privacy
experts warn that the technical requirements to enforce these rules
effectively mandate identity checks for everyone, driving privacy-conscious
users to seek out the best VPN services to protect their digital footprint. 

The legislation, signed into law last year, is part of a growing nationwide
age verification trend where states are stepping in to regulate the
relationship between Big Tech and younger users. 

This isn't Virginias first foray into digital age-gating either. The state
previously enacted strict age-verification requirements for adult-only
websites, a move that historically correlates with a spike in VPN usage as
users attempt to bypass intrusive ID uploads. 

However, this new expansion into general social media covers a much broader
demographic and array of apps, raising the stakes for data privacy.

What the new law changes for teens

The core of the amendment is an update to the VCDPA that specifically
addresses "known minors." As reported by Biometric Update , the law requires
controllers (social media platforms) to prioritize the safety of younger
users. 

Practically, this means platforms operating in Virginia must now default to
the highest privacy settings for minors. They are forbidden from profiling a
minor for advertising purposes or using precise geolocation data without
explicit consent. 

Furthermore, the law introduces a "time limit" approach. Platforms are
expected to limit the hours a minor can spend on the app, or at the very
least, remove the algorithmic design choices, like autoplay videos and
gamified engagement rewards, that lead to excessive screen time. 

While parents may welcome the control, the implementation remains complex. To
distinguish a "known minor" from an adult, platforms generally have to
increase the invasiveness of their age assurance methods. 

This often involves estimating age through biometric analysis or requiring
government ID uploads, measures that privacy advocates argue create massive
new databases of sensitive information vulnerable to hacks.

NetChoice lawsuit and privacy concerns

The enactment of the law has not gone unchallenged. NetChoice, a trade
association representing major tech companies including Google and Meta, has
been vocal in its opposition, arguing that such laws violate the First
Amendment and compromise user security. 

The organization filed a lawsuit in November, akin to its previous legal
battles across the US. The central argument is that by forcing platforms to
verify the age of every user to filter out minors, the state is effectively
ending anonymous web browsing. 

Security experts have long warned that "age verification" is often a synonym
for "identity verification," which creates a honeypot of data for
cybercriminals. 

We have seen federal judges side with these concerns in the recent past, with
courts even blocking similar legislation in other states. As we reported, a
federal judge blocked Louisiana's social media age verification law on
constitutional grounds. Similarly, courts found an Arkansas social media
safety law unconstitutional , citing the undue burden it placed on free 
speech and privacy. 

Despite the pending litigation, the Virginia law is now active. For the
moment, social media giants must navigate compliance or risk hefty fines,
while residents of Virginia may find themselves asked to prove who they are
just to scroll through their feeds. 

======================================================================
Link to news story:
https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/new-virginia-teen-safety-la
w-sparks-privacy-debate-and-fresh-legal-challenges

$$
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
 * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)
SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 134 206 275 300 307 317 400 426 428
SEEN-BY: 229/470 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200
SEEN-BY: 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12
SEEN-BY: 5075/35
PATH: 2320/105 229/426