TZUTC: -0500
MSGID: 2034.consprcy@1:2320/105 2dd77e6c
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
BBSID: CAPCITY2
CHRS: ASCII 1
FORMAT: flowed
UK government targets VPNs in new online safety consultation as Lords vote 
for ban

Date:
Thu, 22 Jan 2026 12:17:02 +0000

Description:
Technology Secretary Liz Kendall promises "evidence-led" approach to keeping
children safe online

FULL STORY

Liz Kendall, the UK Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and 
Technology, has announced a three-month consultation to explore "further
measures" to improve online safety for children, including potential
restrictions on VPNs. 

Ministers will consider action to address concerns that VPNs are being used 
to "get around important protections. The consultation, which was announced 
on Tuesday, will involve discussions with parents, safety organizations, tech
companies, and young people. 

The process will also consider banning social media for under-16s, preventing
companies from harvesting children's data without consent, introducing
overnight curfews, and promoting solutions to curb "excessive doomscrolling". 

The announcement was followed by a government defeat in the House of Lords on
Wednesday, where peers backed an amendment that would ban VPNs for children
under 18 and force providers to implement age checks. Peers also voted in
favor of banning social media for under-16s. 

Labour peers had urged the chamber to wait for the consultation's outcome, 
but others argued the time for deliberation was over. Crossbench peer 
Baroness Kidron said: "Consultation is the playground of the tech lobbyist 
and inaction is the most powerful tool in politics."

'Dither and delay' 

Liz Kendall has defended the consultation period. She said: "Listening to
different views is the right and responsible approach." 

Labour MP Andrew Cooper supported the decision and highlighted the "risk" of
children being driven into "less well-regulated spaces and into virtual
private networks" following government restrictions. 

Meanwhile, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch dismissed the consultation as
"more dither and delay". Badenoch has already confirmed that her party would
introduce an immediate ban on social media for those under 16. 

Kendall has committed to establishing a "clear position before the summer". 

TechRadar has contacted the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
for clarification on whether specific VPN providers will be included in the
consultation process.

Peers vote to ban VPNs for under18s 

On Wednesday, the House of Lords voted in favor of banning the use of
under-18s. The chamber backed the amendment to the Childrens Wellbeing and
Schools Bill by 207 votes to 159, marking a significant government defeat. 

The amendment was introduced by Conservative peer Lord Nash, with support 
from co-signatories including Baroness Benjamin and Baroness Cass. 

Nash argued that the government's consultation was "unnecessary, misconceived
and clearly a last-minute attempt to kick the can down the road". 

Prior to the vote, Labour's Lord Knight of Weymouth acknowledged that VPNs
could "undermine the child safety gains of the Online Safety Act" but warned
that age-gating the apps could be "extremely problematic". He said: 
"My phone uses a VPN, following a personal device cyber consultation offered
by this Parliament. VPNs can make us more secure, and we should not rush to
deprive children of that safety." 

The amendment will now pass to the House of Commons, where the government
which holds a large majority  is expected to try and overturn it. 

TechRadar has reached out to a number of peers involved in the vote.

======================================================================
Link to news story:
https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/uk-government-targets-vpns-
in-new-online-safety-consultation-as-lords-vote-for-ban

$$
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
 * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)
SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 134 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470
SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45
SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35
PATH: 2320/105 229/426