home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 2298 
 Kurt Weiske to Rob Mccart 
 Re: the stores all take a 
 26 Jan 26 07:46:07 
 
TZUTC: -0800
MSGID: 2196.consprcy@1:218/700 2ddccad3
REPLY: 2051.consprcy@1:2320/105 2ddca763
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Win32 master/4fa2ba380 Dec 13 2025 MSC 1944
TID: SBBSecho 3.33-Win32 master/4fa2ba380 Dec 13 2025 MSC 1944
BBSID: REALITY
CHRS: CP437 2
FORMAT: flowed
-=> Rob Mccart wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-

 KW> Yes. I had a plug-in Prius. I'd charge it at home on a 110 volt plug
  > and be able to go to the store on electric, pick up kids from school,
  > and so forth. When the charge drops, you're essentially driving a
  > regular hybrid car.

 RM> How long would it take to charge it up on a regular 110 volt system?

 About 4 1/2 hours on a plain old 110v plug.

 RM> They had a story on the electric cars and one thing that came out
 RM> was that they are not as efficient to run as they often claim.
 RM> They are a little cheaper than gas if you charge them at home
 RM> but if you use the fast chargers the cost goes up enough to be
 RM> higher than using gas for the same trip

 With my BMW, when I first got it, I found a home utility rate plan that
 dropped the overnight price of electricity, and it was cheaper charging
 at home than buying gas. Our rates went up 15% in a year (gotta keep
 those shareholders happy!) and the calculus changed.

 Charging at work ended up costing about as much as gas, because they
 were charging more for power.

 I missed my first gig at this company - we sold hybrid battery electric
 solar systems, essentially a smart battery/solar combo that would
 figure out whether to sell power back to the utility, run off of solar,
 or charge the batteries, based on historical usage and weather
 forecasting.

 We had 4 free chargers as a nice perk, running off of one of our own
 systems.








 .

 KW> Drive down a big hill and you'd get a couple of miles of "free"
  > electric range.

 RM> That much?..  That's something..

 KW>Another interesting design is the Volvo VC90, a full-sized SUV. It
  >started out as an AWD gas car. They took out the rear differential,
  >replaced it with an electric motor, and put the batteries in the
  >driveshaft hump. The gas engine drives the front wheels, the electric
  >drives the rear.

 KW>You can drive all electric, blended, or all gas. I wonder how they
  >handle the change in handling going from rear to front wheel drive?

 RM> That's quite the thing.. I don't know you'd notice much difference
 RM> switching from front wheel drive to rear wheel drive unless you were
 RM> really pushing the performance or on slippery roads.

 RM> The only real difference I notice is when trying to get out if
 RM> you're trying to avoid being stuck in the snow..    B)

 RM> I Much prefer rear wheel drive for high performance cars though.
 RM> I had a 575hp Chevelle SS and you could use spinning the rear
 RM> tires to help steer the car through tight corners and such..
 RM> I suppose along those same lines, if you didn't know what you
 RM> were doing, those spinning wheels might also steer you where
 RM> you Don't want to go..     B)

 RM> ---
 RM>  * SLMR Rob  * * Make a cat float?  You need a blender and ice cream...
 RM>  * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)
 
--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
 * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)
SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187
SEEN-BY: 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 700 810
SEEN-BY: 218/840 860 880 226/30 227/114 229/110 134 206 300 307 317
SEEN-BY: 229/400 426 428 470 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 301/1 320/219
SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/105
SEEN-BY: 5075/35
PATH: 218/700 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca