Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2298  |
|  Kurt Weiske to Rob Mccart  |
|  Re: the stores all take a  |
|  26 Jan 26 07:46:07  |
 TZUTC: -0800 MSGID: 2196.consprcy@1:218/700 2ddccad3 REPLY: 2051.consprcy@1:2320/105 2ddca763 PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Win32 master/4fa2ba380 Dec 13 2025 MSC 1944 TID: SBBSecho 3.33-Win32 master/4fa2ba380 Dec 13 2025 MSC 1944 BBSID: REALITY CHRS: CP437 2 FORMAT: flowed -=> Rob Mccart wrote to KURT WEISKE <=- KW> Yes. I had a plug-in Prius. I'd charge it at home on a 110 volt plug > and be able to go to the store on electric, pick up kids from school, > and so forth. When the charge drops, you're essentially driving a > regular hybrid car. RM> How long would it take to charge it up on a regular 110 volt system? About 4 1/2 hours on a plain old 110v plug. RM> They had a story on the electric cars and one thing that came out RM> was that they are not as efficient to run as they often claim. RM> They are a little cheaper than gas if you charge them at home RM> but if you use the fast chargers the cost goes up enough to be RM> higher than using gas for the same trip With my BMW, when I first got it, I found a home utility rate plan that dropped the overnight price of electricity, and it was cheaper charging at home than buying gas. Our rates went up 15% in a year (gotta keep those shareholders happy!) and the calculus changed. Charging at work ended up costing about as much as gas, because they were charging more for power. I missed my first gig at this company - we sold hybrid battery electric solar systems, essentially a smart battery/solar combo that would figure out whether to sell power back to the utility, run off of solar, or charge the batteries, based on historical usage and weather forecasting. We had 4 free chargers as a nice perk, running off of one of our own systems. . KW> Drive down a big hill and you'd get a couple of miles of "free" > electric range. RM> That much?.. That's something.. KW>Another interesting design is the Volvo VC90, a full-sized SUV. It >started out as an AWD gas car. They took out the rear differential, >replaced it with an electric motor, and put the batteries in the >driveshaft hump. The gas engine drives the front wheels, the electric >drives the rear. KW>You can drive all electric, blended, or all gas. I wonder how they >handle the change in handling going from rear to front wheel drive? RM> That's quite the thing.. I don't know you'd notice much difference RM> switching from front wheel drive to rear wheel drive unless you were RM> really pushing the performance or on slippery roads. RM> The only real difference I notice is when trying to get out if RM> you're trying to avoid being stuck in the snow.. B) RM> I Much prefer rear wheel drive for high performance cars though. RM> I had a 575hp Chevelle SS and you could use spinning the rear RM> tires to help steer the car through tight corners and such.. RM> I suppose along those same lines, if you didn't know what you RM> were doing, those spinning wheels might also steer you where RM> you Don't want to go.. B) RM> --- RM> * SLMR Rob * * Make a cat float? You need a blender and ice cream... RM> * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105) --- MultiMail/Win v0.52 * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700) SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 SEEN-BY: 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 700 810 SEEN-BY: 218/840 860 880 226/30 227/114 229/110 134 206 300 307 317 SEEN-BY: 229/400 426 428 470 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 301/1 320/219 SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/105 SEEN-BY: 5075/35 PATH: 218/700 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]