In fairness to Tim Richardson, this should piss him off.

 ----------------------------------------------------------------

 National Catholic Reporter
 Published on  National Catholic Reporter  (http://ncronline.org)

 Fairness conspicuously missing in deficit reduction legislation

 By  Thomas C. Fox
 Created  Aug 02, 2011

 * NCR Today  [2]

 Watching the politically manufactured debt ceiling debate draw
 to its sad conclusion, I think of the last stanza of T.S.
 Eliot's often quoted poem, "The Hollow Men" …

 ... Not with a bang but a whimper

 However you cut it, there is something quite disturbing -- and
 immoral -- about a debt reduction package that calls for cuts
 in critical services to the poor while at the same time calling
 for no sacrifice from the wealthiest elite in our nation. This,
 of course, is one more sign, if any more were needed, of a
 well-heeled and finely purchased Congress by the super rich
 among us. It's quite sad and should be upsetting to all who
 support democracy around the world.

 Those in Congress who justify this disproportionate solution to
 our nation's financial predicament under the banner of "no
 tax hikes" should be ashamed of themselves. However, don't
 expect any self examination of conscience soon. These folks swim
 in waters of sweet justification and self-satisfaction never
 inconvenienced by information or reason. Simple self-justifying
 ideology, fanned by those who most benefit from it, the super
 rich, propels them either mindlessly or blind to conscience.

 After all, they apparently continue to look into the faces of
 their children without embarrassment.

 Keep in mind the very modest tax increase that was initially on
 the table, the long needed elimination of a tax break to the
 top one percent of the nation's already very well-off asset
 gatherers, was forced off by political reality before serious
 negotiations began to take place.

 Elementary, if not superficial fairness, would have required
 half the savings come from tax increases and half from spending
 cuts. But no, the starting point was to cut spending on programs
 that have modestly enabled the poorest among us to find food and
 shelter for their families during recent years as the gulf
 between rich and poor has expanded at an alarming rate.

 The median wealth of white households is now 20 times that of
 black households [3]and 18 times that of Hispanic households,
 according to a Pew Research Center analysis of newly available
 government data from 2009. Twenty times!

 The tax increase proposal that was forced from discussion by the
 Republican-controlled House of Representatives would have
 modestly raised only three dollars more from every $1,000 among
 those comfortably over the $250,000 mark. Fairness, real
 fairness, should have required 10 times that amount. But little
 that characterizes political discussions in Washington these
 days can be characterized by fairness and, I might add, reason
 or simple human compassion.

 So with cuts in spending on the proposed deficit reduction
 agreement bearing all weight one is left wondering how we got to
 the point. It is fact, not cliché, those two wars President
 George W. Bush initiated -- both of choice as well as across the
 board tax cuts, by far the largest of these benefitting the most
 comfortable among us -- have caused much to the problem. An
 increasingly expensive, complex and inefficient insurance
 industry-controlled medical benefit program, has played another
 major role.

 Check out these figures in a chart
 that appeared in Sunday's New York Times.

 

 By the way, those two wars? We have borrowed every dollar that
 funds them, passing on the costs to those who will now begin to
 feel an even greater pinch to their already insecure
 livelihoods, and, of course, to our children and their children.

 I call those who have actively encouraged our military
 engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan without also having lobbied
 for war tax hikes cheap patriots. Yes, cheap patriots. "Send in
 the troops," they have effectively said. "But don't ask me
 to open my wallet to help pay the price."

 Most reasonable people recognize that digging us out of the
 financial hole we are in will require common sacrifice. This is
 as it should be. Those with greater means, nearly all of whom
 have done very nicely in their financial investment portfolios
 during the last decade, should also bear the greater burden of
 these sacrifices. However, I'm not counting on it.

 This would only be fair; it would express common purpose and our
 commitments to the common good, so much at the center of our
 church's teachings on the social contract and social justice.

 However, do not rely solely on me for locating the foundations
 of Catholic social thought. Go back to the beginnings and to its
 biblical origins. The evangelist, Matthew, wrote the following
 in chapter 25, and it is pertinent today.

    Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty
   and give you drink? When did we see you a stranger and welcome
   you, or naked and clothe you? When did we see you ill or in
   prison, and visit you? And the king will say to them in reply,
   'Amen, I say to you, whatever you did for one of these least
   brothers of mine, you did for me.'

 Going forward, were we to keep our eyes focused, as we figure

 out the tough choices ahead, on the "least" among us,
 we'll have a better chance of restoring fiscal, and moral,
 health to our nation.

 After all, we're not a poor nation; just a seemingly soulless
 one.

 Fox is NCR Editor. Can be reached at tfox@ncronline.org.

 By NCR Staff


 Copyright © The National Catholic Reporter Publishing Company
 115 E. Armour Blvd., Kansas City, MO 64111


BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... Doesn't it bother you that republicans are rooting for the apocalypse?
--- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
 * Origin: Since 1991 And Were Still Here! DOCSPLACE.TZO.COM (1:123/140)