XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.arts.tv   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: fmhlaw@comcast.net   
      
   On 2/20/2014 6:27 PM, trotsky wrote:   
   > On 2/20/14 3:25 PM, MattB . wrote:   
   >> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:24:13 -0500, "Dano"    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> "Hunter"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:MPG.2d6f95afad1bbb1798b6aa@news.optonline.net...   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Liberal democrats hate guns so the characterization doesn't make sense.   
   >>> --   
   >>> ==================================================   
   >>>   
   >>> Your characterization of "liberal democrats" makes no real sense either.   
   >>> The notion that we (yes...I admit it...I'm liberal) "hate" guns is   
   >>> ludicrous.  Some of us even own them.  What most object to is the   
   >>> unrestrained distribution...the lack of registration ...control.  I love   
   >>> cars too...but I don't want every untrained imbecile driving one without   
   >>> registering and even insuring it.  In fact...maybe that would help   
   >>> with guns   
   >>> too.  Require insuring them too.  But certainly doesn't seem   
   >>> outrageous to   
   >>> want better laws regarding something so dangerous.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> In my experience many Democrats don't hate guns.  I live in northern   
   >> Western Washington and our Gun range is about I'd say 2/3rds   
   >> Democrats.   
   >   
   > Wow, how did you figure that out?   
   >   
   Because their targets have Reagan's or Bush's face on them?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)