XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.arts.tv   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: buffhunter@my-deja.com   
      
   In article , janeanddano@yahoo.com says...   
   >   
   > >"Hunter"  wrote in message   
   > > news:MPG.2d6f95afad1bbb1798b6aa@news.optonline.net...   
   >   
   >   
   > > Liberal democrats hate guns so the characterization doesn't make sense.   
   >   
   > Your characterization of "liberal democrats" makes no real sense either.   
   > The notion that we (yes...I admit it...I'm liberal) "hate" guns is   
   > ludicrous.  Some of us even own them.  What most object to is the   
   > unrestrained distribution...the lack of registration ...control.  I love   
   > cars too...but I don't want every untrained imbecile driving one without   
   > registering and even insuring it.  In fact...maybe that would help with guns   
   > too.  Require insuring them too.  But certainly doesn't seem outrageous to   
   > want better laws regarding something so dangerous.   
   ----   
   I know some do, but I believe Stan is saying that a "liberal democrat" was the   
   shooter is in order to separate the tragedy from the debate about gun   
   ownership. That is to deflect the issue he is saying anyone who shoots up a   
   place is a "liberal democrat" because, in his view, liberal democrats will jump   
   on the issue to take "their" guns. That is the way I believe the author of the   
   thread Stan would interpet you saying "...want better laws regarding something   
   so dangerous" because they really hate guns and want to take them away for   
   example.   
   --   
   ----->Hunter   
      
   "No man in the wrong can stand up against   
    a fellow that's in the right and keeps on acomin'."   
      
                  -----William J. McDonald   
              Captain, Texas Rangers from 1891 to 1907   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)