XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.arts.tv   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: trdell1234@gmail..com   
      
   On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:44:27 -0700, polonez  wrote:   
      
   >On 2/21/2014 4:01 AM, trotsky wrote:   
   >> On 2/20/14 9:13 PM, MattB . wrote:   
   >>> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 19:27:00 -0600, trotsky  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2/20/14 3:25 PM, MattB . wrote:   
   >>>>> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:24:13 -0500, "Dano"    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> "Hunter"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>> news:MPG.2d6f95afad1bbb1798b6aa@news.optonline.net...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Liberal democrats hate guns so the characterization doesn't make   
   >>>>>> sense.   
   >>>>>> --   
   >>>>>> ==================================================   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Your characterization of "liberal democrats" makes no real sense   
   >>>>>> either.   
   >>>>>> The notion that we (yes...I admit it...I'm liberal) "hate" guns is   
   >>>>>> ludicrous.  Some of us even own them.  What most object to is the   
   >>>>>> unrestrained distribution...the lack of registration ...control.  I   
   >>>>>> love   
   >>>>>> cars too...but I don't want every untrained imbecile driving one   
   >>>>>> without   
   >>>>>> registering and even insuring it.  In fact...maybe that would help   
   >>>>>> with guns   
   >>>>>> too.  Require insuring them too.  But certainly doesn't seem   
   >>>>>> outrageous to   
   >>>>>> want better laws regarding something so dangerous.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> In my experience many Democrats don't hate guns.  I live in northern   
   >>>>> Western Washington and our Gun range is about I'd say 2/3rds   
   >>>>> Democrats.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Wow, how did you figure that out?   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Well maybe this is unlike most liberal thinking but I go there often   
   >>> and know many of them.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Yeah, that's pretty vague.  What percentage of the clientele do you   
   >> "know"?  You'd have to have a pretty good representative sampling to say   
   >> "2/3rd" are Dems.  Do you know half the people that go there?  1/4?   
   >> 1/10th?   
   >>   
   >   
   >Is this truly worth micro-debating? If he's in a left coast liberal   
   >demographic area, that would tend to support what he says. And Dems who   
   >don't hate guns would be more likely to go to a range than those who do.   
      
      
   I'd bet I'm close in saying about 2/3rd are Democrat.  Didn't say   
   progressive.  Personally I prefer everyone who carries a weapon be   
   proficient in it's use and on gun safety.  Also know how to safely and   
   correctly maintain them.   
      
   I've noticed this about the far left.  They don't like personal   
   observation everything must come from government or MSM.   
      
   One WY says I'm racist but can't point to it in the post says it is   
   "subliminal racist language".  What is that?  Personally I said I am   
   against preferential treatment based on Race.  That set her off.   
   Says I need prove I'm not racist.  How does one do that?   
      
   Now on this issue.  One can say anything here.  I could say I teach   
   Gun safety and basics to young and newbies.  I could say I help at the   
   food bank and churches.  I can say anything.  The only way to give   
   this liberal the proof he requires is to take the member list compare   
   it to registered voters and their party affiliations and post the   
   results.  That would be just wrong even if I had access to that list.   
      
    I am very much against the posting of who has weapons and who doesn't   
   like that scumbag news organization did back east.  All they did was   
   tell criminals which houses were easy targets.   
      
   OK Babel mode off.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)