XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.arts.tv
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: do@le.nz
On 2/21/2014 11:18 AM, MattB . wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:44:27 -0700, polonez wrote:
>
>> On 2/21/2014 4:01 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>> On 2/20/14 9:13 PM, MattB . wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 19:27:00 -0600, trotsky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/20/14 3:25 PM, MattB . wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:24:13 -0500, "Dano"
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Hunter" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:MPG.2d6f95afad1bbb1798b6aa@news.optonline.net...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Liberal democrats hate guns so the characterization doesn't make
>>>>>>> sense.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> ==================================================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your characterization of "liberal democrats" makes no real sense
>>>>>>> either.
>>>>>>> The notion that we (yes...I admit it...I'm liberal) "hate" guns is
>>>>>>> ludicrous. Some of us even own them. What most object to is the
>>>>>>> unrestrained distribution...the lack of registration ...control. I
>>>>>>> love
>>>>>>> cars too...but I don't want every untrained imbecile driving one
>>>>>>> without
>>>>>>> registering and even insuring it. In fact...maybe that would help
>>>>>>> with guns
>>>>>>> too. Require insuring them too. But certainly doesn't seem
>>>>>>> outrageous to
>>>>>>> want better laws regarding something so dangerous.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In my experience many Democrats don't hate guns. I live in northern
>>>>>> Western Washington and our Gun range is about I'd say 2/3rds
>>>>>> Democrats.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Wow, how did you figure that out?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well maybe this is unlike most liberal thinking but I go there often
>>>> and know many of them.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, that's pretty vague. What percentage of the clientele do you
>>> "know"? You'd have to have a pretty good representative sampling to say
>>> "2/3rd" are Dems. Do you know half the people that go there? 1/4?
>>> 1/10th?
>>>
>>
>> Is this truly worth micro-debating? If he's in a left coast liberal
>> demographic area, that would tend to support what he says. And Dems who
>> don't hate guns would be more likely to go to a range than those who do.
>
>
> I'd bet I'm close in saying about 2/3rd are Democrat. Didn't say
> progressive. Personally I prefer everyone who carries a weapon be
> proficient in it's use and on gun safety. Also know how to safely and
> correctly maintain them.
That is the best policy, period.
> I've noticed this about the far left. They don't like personal
> observation everything must come from government or MSM.
That is a sound observation.
> One WY says I'm racist but can't point to it in the post says it is
> "subliminal racist language". What is that? Personally I said I am
> against preferential treatment based on Race. That set her off.
> Says I need prove I'm not racist. How does one do that?
I think you're dealing with a reasonably brain-damaged Canuck there,
best not to invest the slightest concern in what the socialists north of
the border think, they're fighting the appalling weather and their own
rights-hungry state.
> Now on this issue. One can say anything here. I could say I teach
> Gun safety and basics to young and newbies. I could say I help at the
> food bank and churches. I can say anything. The only way to give
> this liberal the proof he requires is to take the member list compare
> it to registered voters and their party affiliations and post the
> results. That would be just wrong even if I had access to that list.
Agreed.
> I am very much against the posting of who has weapons and who doesn't
> like that scumbag news organization did back east. All they did was
> tell criminals which houses were easy targets.
>
> OK Babel mode off.
Sound thoughts.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
