Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    co.politics    |    Nice state sadly overrun by libtards    |    50,863 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 48,957 of 50,863    |
|    Just Wondering to polonez    |
|    Re: Judge orders new mental exam of libe    |
|    24 Feb 14 12:04:06    |
      XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.arts.tv       XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       From: fmhlaw@comcast.net              On 2/24/2014 10:54 AM, polonez wrote:       > On 2/24/2014 10:33 AM, RD Sandman wrote:       >>       >> I don't like any chance the government has of collecting information on       >> my guns or whether I even have any.       >       > Well I can not disagree with that, other than to note that they already       > have the ability to tightly control full auto weaponry ...              Well, federal law does restrict LEGAL ownership of full auto firearms.       I question whether that actually amounts to tight control. After all,       it's not very difficult, if someone is willing to violate federal law       (and what criminal isn't), to modify just about any semiautomatic       firearm so it will operate as fully automatic. If someone is willing to       rob and kill at gunpoint, a federal law adding criminal possession of an       automatic firearm to the charges they are already willing to risk will       not stop them.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca