XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.arts.tv   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: do@le.nz   
      
   On 2/24/2014 1:04 PM, Yoorghis@Jurgis.net wrote:   
   > On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:33:32 -0600, RD Sandman   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >> I don't like any chance the government has of collecting information on   
   >> my guns or whether I even have any.   
   >   
   > Why?   
      
   You seem to discount what registration has meat in other nations, it   
   tends to lead to confiscation.   
      
   > You have never, nor will ever,  be protected from "Gummint" because   
   > you have a fucking gun.   
      
   How telling of you to admit that he would need more than just a gun to   
   be protected from a confiscatory "gummint"[sic].   
      
   > 2nd wasn't there for what you seem to think.   
      
   I suspect that whatever you "think" it exists for bares little   
   resemblance to reality.   
      
   > But, was a time when knowing there were some that carried pistols   
   > could, by practicing a bit, blow a fucking hole thru your head for   
   > most any reason and be not held liable.   
      
   Does saying "fucking" give you a little tingle of power?   
      
   > However, if that's your world, you at least oughta know why real   
   > americans worked so hard to put an end to it.   
      
   Why would that be "his world"?   
      
   I doubt he's old enough to have lived in frontier times.   
      
   > Some of the first laws enacted by incorporated towns (in the REAL   
   > west, not Hollyworld)---were gun laws.   
   >   
   > Why was that, do you think?   
      
   Maybe it had something to do with robber barons who were fencing in the   
   open range and desired less immediate and deadly opposition.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)