Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    co.politics    |    Nice state sadly overrun by libtards    |    50,863 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 49,045 of 50,863    |
|    Serial Killers to All    |
|    Remember the Sand Creek Massacre    |
|    01 Jan 15 02:19:50    |
      XPost: can.politics, alt.politics.democrat, alt.guns       XPost: soc.culture.usa       From: serial-killers@liberal-democrats.com              NEW HAVEN — MANY people think of the Civil War and America’s       Indian wars as distinct subjects, one following the other. But       those who study the Sand Creek Massacre know different.              On Nov. 29, 1864, as Union armies fought through Virginia and       Georgia, Col. John Chivington led some 700 cavalry troops in an       unprovoked attack on peaceful Cheyenne and Arapaho villagers at       Sand Creek in Colorado. They murdered nearly 200 women, children       and older men.              Sand Creek was one of many assaults on American Indians during       the war, from Patrick Edward Connor’s massacre of Shoshone       villagers along the Idaho-Utah border at Bear River on Jan. 29,       1863, to the forced removal and incarceration of thousands of       Navajo people in 1864 known as the Long Walk.              In terms of sheer horror, few events matched Sand Creek.       Pregnant women were murdered and scalped, genitalia were paraded       as trophies, and scores of wanton acts of violence characterize       the accounts of the few Army officers who dared to report them.       Among them was Capt. Silas Soule, who had been with Black Kettle       and Cheyenne leaders at the September peace negotiations with       Gov. John Evans of Colorado, the region’s superintendent of       Indians affairs (as well as a founder of both the University of       Denver and Northwestern University). Soule publicly exposed       Chivington’s actions and, in retribution, was later murdered in       Denver.              After news of the massacre spread, Evans and Chivington were       forced to resign from their appointments. But neither faced       criminal charges, and the government refused to compensate the       victims or their families in any way. Indeed, Sand Creek was       just one part of a campaign to take the Cheyenne’s once vast       land holdings across the region. A territory that had hardly any       white communities in 1850 had, by 1870, lost many Indians, who       were pushed violently off the Great Plains by white settlers and       the federal government.              These and other campaigns amounted to what is today called       ethnic cleansing: an attempted eradication and dispossession of       an entire indigenous population. Many scholars suggest that such       violence conforms to other 20th-century categories of analysis,       like settler colonial genocide and crimes against humanity.              Sand Creek, Bear River and the Long Walk remain important parts       of the Civil War and of American history. But in our popular       narrative, the Civil War obscures such campaigns against       American Indians. In fact, the war made such violence possible:       The paltry Union Army of 1858, before its wartime expansion,       could not have attacked, let alone removed, the fortified Navajo       communities in the Four Corners, while Southern secession gave a       powerful impetus to expand American territory westward.       Territorial leaders like Evans were given more resources and       power to negotiate with, and fight against, powerful Western       tribes like the Shoshone, Cheyenne, Lakota and Comanche. The       violence of this time was fueled partly by the lust for power by       civilian and military leaders desperate to obtain glory and       wartime recognition.              Expansion continued after the war, powered by a revived American       economy but also by a new spirit of national purpose, a sense       that America, having suffered in the war, now had the right to       conquer more peoples and territories.              The United States has yet to fully recognize the violent       destruction wrought against indigenous peoples by the Civil War       and the Union Army. Connor and Evans have cities, monuments and       plaques in their honor, as well as two universities and even       Colorado’s Mount Evans, home to the highest paved road in North       America.              Saturday’s 150th anniversary will be commemorated many ways: The       National Park Service’s Sand Creek Massacre Historic Site, the       descendant Cheyenne and Arapaho communities, other Native       American community members and their non-Native supporters will       commemorate the massacre. An annual memorial run will trace the       route of Chivington’s troops from Sand Creek to Denver, where an       evening vigil will be held Dec. 2.              The University of Denver and Northwestern are also reckoning       with this legacy, creating committees that have recognized       Evans’s culpability. Like many academic institutions, both are       deliberating how to expand Native American studies and student       service programs. Yet the near-absence of Native American       faculty members, administrators and courses reflects their       continued failure to take more than partial steps.              While the government has made efforts to recognize individual       atrocities, it has a long way to go toward recognizing how       deeply the decades-long campaign of eradication ran, let alone       recognizing how, in the face of such violence, Native American       nations and their cultures have survived. Few Americans know of       the violence of this time, let alone the subsequent violation of       Indian treaties, of reservation boundaries and of Indian       families by government actions, including the half-century of       forced removal of Indian children to boarding schools.              One symbolic but necessary first step would be a National Day of       Indigenous Remembrance and Survival, perhaps on Nov. 29, the       anniversary of Sand Creek. Another would be commemorative       memorials, not only in Denver and Evanston but in Washington,       too. We commemorate “discovery” and “expansion” with Columbus       Day and the Gateway arch, but nowhere is there national       recognition of the people who suffered from those “achievements”       — and have survived amid continuing cycles of colonialism.              Correction: November 27, 2014       An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that the       American Indian leader Black Kettle was killed in the Sand Creek       Massacre. He died at the Battle of Washita in Oklahoma in 1868.              http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/28/opinion/remember-the-sand-       creek-massacre.html?_r=0                             --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca